Force Science News #20:
What the New Shell Ejection Study Found + Brits Visit FSRC
In this edition:
I. Force Science Seminar Is Just Days Away
II. What the New Shell Ejection Study Found
III. New Clue To Potential Danger
IV. Brits Visit FSRC to Unravel Mysteries of Police Shootings
V. Should Red Be the Hot New Cop Color?
I. GET AHEAD OF TROUBLE! JOIN THE FIRST-EVER FORCE SCIENCE SEMINAR JUNE 10.
If you haven’t already registered to attend the first-ever Force Science Seminar, do it now! Time is running out.
Officers, investigators and other professionals from across the country whose jobs involve using, probing or reviewing police use of deadly force are signed up for the one-day event, scheduled for June 10 in a suburb of Seattle, WA.
The program will report the latest findings from the Force Science Research Center on how to win lethal confrontations from street to court. Seminar presenter will be Dr. Bill Lewinski, FSRC’s executive director, who has built an international record for his use of scientific findings about the little-known dynamics of armed confrontations to clear officers of unjust charges of abusive force.
For full details on how to register–and why this may be the most important training experience you’ll ever have-visit:
II. NEW SHELL EJECTION STUDY SUGGESTS: GUN HANDLING DETERMINES WHERE THE EMPTIES FALL
An expanded study of shell casing ejection patterns, with important legal implications for law enforcement, has just been completed by the Force Science Research Center, with cooperation of the Los Angeles County (CA) Sheriff’s Dept.
Details and an analysis will be reported in the next issue of Force Science News, but FSRC Executive Director Bill Lewinski says that the new research tentatively confirms that “how a handgun is held has a more profound impact on the ejection pattern than caliber, ammunition, design or make of handgun.”
FSRC became interested in this subject 2 years after Lewinski was recruited as an expert witness for an Arizona officer who was charged with murder in the shooting of a female driver whom he alleged threatened him with her vehicle. An issue of credibility arose when a firearms examiner adamantly claimed the officer was lying about his position during the incident, based on where a spent shell casing from his semiautomatic was found.
Two preliminary FSRC studies conducted with single shooters firing a total of 150 rounds concluded that ejected-shell placement can vary radically depending on how a weapon is held. After Lewinski’s testimony to this fact at trial, the officer was acquitted.
** For more, see Force Science News #1 at:
The new study involved about 60 officers from LASD, each firing at least 110 rounds with a variety of handgun models held in 11 different positions. “Without a doubt, how a gun is manipulated when shooting has a greater impact on ejection pattern than any mechanical influence,” Lewinski says. “With a study of this extent, the empirical reliability is very high.”
This automatically becomes the largest study of its kind–because it is the only study that has focused on physical manipulation as a factor in ejection patterning. “Everyone else has come at it from the mechanics of the gun, the quality of ammunition, even the spring tension of the magazine on the slide,” Lewinski explains.
“This is a tragedy. Because of inadequate and incomplete ‘evidence,’ officers have been erroneously charged with capital crimes. Ignorance has been used to accuse these officers. A study of this nature should have been done long ago, and with all the firearms experts around who claim to speak with authority on this subject, it’s absurd that it wasn’t.”
Under the coordination of Lewinski and Lt. Joe Hartshorne of the LASD Homicide Investigation Division, the latest research was led by Dave Karwoski, an FSRC Technical Advisory Board member with 30 years’ experience as a sheriff’s deputy and firearms instructor. He was assisted by Mark Peterson, a law enforcement student at Minnesota State University-Mankato, home of the FSRC.
III. STUDY FINDS NEW CLUE TO POTENTIAL DANGER
Canadian researchers have added a subtle but potentially significant nuance to the old warning, “Watch the hands.”
A study at the University of Alberta has found that the length of a man’s index finger relative to his ring finger can be a predictor of his predisposition for physical aggression. The shorter the index finger is compared to the ring finger, the higher his potential for physical violence.
This sounds like lockup lore. Even the study’s co-author, Dr. Peter Hurd, thought the finger-aggression link was “a pile of hooey” until he studied the data. But Dr. Bill Lewinski, executive director of the Force Science Research Center at Minnesota State University-Mankato, says the finding has a firm foundation in human science.
“This is associated with the level of testosterone a fetus is exposed to when it is developing in the womb,” Lewinski told Force Science News. “Testosterone influences not only how the aggression-related centers of the brain develop but can also affect the evolution of fingers that is taking place at the same time. The more testosterone, the greater the impact.”
The effect tends to negatively influence the maturing fetus’s capacity for empathy and compassion, as well, Lewinski says. However, the study found no correlation between finger lengths and nonphysical forms of aggression, such as mere verbal abuse, anger or hostility. Nor does the finger-length finding appear to apply to women.
Because of personal variables within the general results of the study, Hurd cautions against drawing hard conclusions about specific people. But Lewinski points out that you should be watching the hands of subjects you deal with as an officer-safety consideration anyway and this is one among other potential indicators of trouble that you can take note of.
“More than anything,” Hurd says of his study in a report published in HealthDay News, “I think the findings reinforce that a large part of our personalities and our traits are determined while we’re still in the womb.”
Hurd’s research group plans to continue its investigation of physical aggression by studying the relative finger lengths of hockey players to see if there is a correlation with the penalty minutes they rack up in a given season
More details of his recent findings appear in the March issue of the journal Biological Psychology.
IV. FSRC HELPS VISITING BRITS UNRAVEL TROUBLING MYSTERIES OF POLICE SHOOTINGS
Representatives of 2 elite British policing units and a major police union traveled to the Force Science Research Center this month [5/05] for a private 3-day update on the latest scientific findings about officer-involved shootings.
Three of the visitors (Andrea Earl, Peter Smyth and Dave Bonnett) were spokespeople for the Metropolitan Police Federation while Mark Williams was from the main firearms unit (SO19)which supplies armed-response vehicles for all of London while Dave Blocksidge was from the Diplomatic Protection Group (SO16) (comparable to the U.S. Secret Service.)
“We’ve had a number of shootings that have caused problems over the years,” Cst. Mark Williams of the SO19 firearms unit told Force Science News. “These have involved perceptual distortions, the movements of subjects and officers, and the effect of memory on the writing of notes [reports].”
As in the US, he says that an “incredible naivet‚ about firearms” among civilians complicates police activities. “It is frightening, really.”
The visitors were particularly interested in information that might prove relevant to a 1999 incident in which 2 English officers shot a suspect in the head who they thought was wielding a shotgun inside a bag. After the smoke cleared, the “gun” was found to be a wooden table leg. The officers were charged with murder and a coroner’s inquest returned a verdict of “unlawful killing.” Although the verdict was overturned, the case still is not fully resolved. A second coroner’s inquest returned a verdict of unlawful killing that was recently overturned at the high court of London. However, the officers are still awaiting a third decision by the crown prosecution service.
The presentations they experienced at FSRC headquarters at Minnesota State University-Mankato “answered so many questions,” Williams says. “We received research information on police shootings we haven’t had any knowledge of. It was awesome. There’s nothing like this in the U.K.”
“The information and knowledge that I have gained from the FSRC Seminar was compelling and essential,” said Blocksidge. “Any police officer who must justify any use of force incident may be attempting to explain their actions without realizing the perilous road ahead of them. Police departments around the world must sit up and take notice of FSRC’s research. If they choose to ignore it then grave injustices for police officers, witnesses, suspects and communities will continue.”
Their stay included consultations with FSRC Executive Director Dr. Bill Lewinski on FSRC research, with National Advisory Board member Dr. Alexis Artwohl on critical incident survival, with fellow National Advisory Board Member William Everett, an attorney with the League of Minnesota Cities, on the public relations aspects of high-profile shootings, and with Deputy Director Bill Hudson on the unique technology involved in FSRC’s research. Exercises on the state-of-the-art Milo training simulator donated to FSRC by IES Interactive Training were also involved.
Next fall FSRC representatives will be traveling to England to present research findings to a broader audience of police professionals in the United Kingdom.
V. SHOULD RED BE THE NEW POLICE FASHION COLOR?
Should police uniforms be red? Would that make you safer and more easily in control of touchy situations?
You might jump to that conclusion after a quick read of a new study by British scientists of results at the 2004 Olympics.
A research team from England’s University of Durham compared the performance of athletes randomly assigned red outfits or body protectors compared to those who wore blue in one-on-one competitions of boxing, tae kwon do, Greco-Roman wrestling and freestyle wrestling.
Those wearing red won about 55 per cent of the time, while those in blue triumphed in only 45 per cent of their contests. According to reporter Bryn Nelson writing in Newsday, the researchers conclude that “the evolutionary connections between the color red and male dominance or testosterone-driven aggression in animals may well extend to humans, perhaps providing a subtle lift or leaving an opponent feeling, well, a little blue.”
In other words, the person wearing red may receive a subconscious hormonal boost that builds confidence while his opponent experiences a subconscious hesitation that either causes that person to back off or provides a slight momentary advantage that the red-wearer can then capitalize on.
Before carrying these findings to the realm of police uniforms, however, Dr. Bill Lewinski, an expert in behavioral psychology and executive director of the Force Science Research Center, advises caution. Besides projecting an image of dominance, red can also be a sign of confrontation and can be seen as a challenge, he points out.
“To a friendly or neutral audience, it conveys confidence and assertion,” he says. “But to a hostile audience, it can invite confrontation. It could create a negative impact that you then have to work to overcome, whereas a more neutral color like brown or blue can help neutralize and disperse hostility. Of course we are talking subtleties in both cases, but subtle influences can be important.”
How about the famously red uniform of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police? “Yes, that was used to advantage, especially in the RCMP’s dealings with North American Indian populations,” says Lewinski. “But the RCMP also had a reputation for being compassionate and concerned about the Indians. This earned them a tremendous amount of respect and was able to neutralize the red.”
The RCMP finally got rid of the red uniform for day-to-day duty assignments, Lewinski recalls, because it was considered “too high profile.”
The study of Olympian athletes is reported in the May 19, 2005 issue of the journal Nature.
(c) 2005: Force Science Research Center, www.forcescience.org. Reprints
allowed by request. For reprint clearance, please e-mail:
firstname.lastname@example.org. FORCE SCIENCE is a registered trademark of The
Force Science Research Center, a non-profit organization based at Minnesota
State University, Mankato.
Written by Force Science Institute
May 31st, 2005 at 3:57 pm
© 2017 Force Science Institute Ltd.