“It’s Scary How Easily An Officer Can End Up Charged With Murder” ( Part )

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Part 1 of a 2-part series

When Sheriff’s Inv. Tim Robertson was asked to give an official statement about fatally shooting a career criminal who’d tried to take his gun away, he was in an ER under the effect of a sedative and undergoing treatment for what he feared was a heart attack brought on by the life-or-death struggle he’d just endured.

On the advice of an attorney, he declined to be interviewed. He was perfectly willing to explain what happened–wanted to, in fact. But he needed time to get his medical status clarified and his head cleared, to calm down and to sleep.

The next Robertson knew, he was arrested and charged with voluntary manslaughter, later “upgraded” to murder. A coroner’s preliminary examination revealed that Robertson’s attacker had been shot in the back.

Without learning Robertson’s version of events, without waiting for the completion of the post-shooting investigation, and without receiving full autopsy and toxicology findings, the circuit solicitor (prosecutor) had decided to pursue criminal proceedings that could send the 41-year-old lawman to state prison for 3 years to life.

“The rule of law prohibits any officer from shooting a fleeing suspect in the back four times,” the solicitor was quoted in news reports. “That’s why I’m charging him.”

“That’s absurd,” attorney Vinton Lide, who eventually headed Robertson’s defense team, told Force Science News. “I’ve never seen anything like this in 44 years of practice. It’s shameful and inexcusable.”

The case, which went to trial earlier this month [10/06] in South Carolina, dramatically illustrates the pressing need for the criminal justice system to better understand the vital role science can and should play in the investigation and evaluation of officer-involved shootings. As things too often stand now, says Dr. Bill Lewinski, executive director of the Force Science Research Center at Minnesota State University-Mankato, “it’s scary how easily an officer can end up charged with murder.”

The dead man in Robertson’s controversial shooting was William Sheffield, a 45-year-old ex-convict with a long criminal record and murals of jailhouse tattoos that reflected it. In late 2005 he was out on bond on chop-shop charges, and Robertson, with the Darlington County (SC) SO, had been in a weeks-long cat-and-mouse pursuit of him on new grand larceny warrants for the theft of an $8,000 stainless steel grill and 3 hauling trailers. Sheffield, it would be learned later, had told associates he had no intention of going back to jail.

On Thursday, Dec. 29, a fellow investigator, Andy Locklair, got a tip from a snitch who happened to be a relative of Sheffield that the wanted felon and his girlfriend were holing up with an acquaintance in a mobile home in neighboring Chesterfield County.

That night, Robertson and Locklair rendezvoused outside a closed country store near the alleged hideout with a deputy from Chesterfield County SD and a patrol officer from the nearest hamlet, Society Hill (pop. 700). The trailer house was said to be about 2 miles west down a paved road in a hilly area of dense piney woods, hardscrabble farms, and scattered mobile homes, although the exact location was uncertain.

Robertson was well acquainted with Sheffield and knew his GMC pickup truck, so it was agreed he should explore down the road in search of it, using his unmarked Crown Vic to stay low-key.

At about 10 p.m., Robertson was heading back from an unsuccessful sweep of the road when he saw a pickup truck swing into the unpaved driveway of one of the properties he’d earlier passed by. The night was moonless and starless, the area unlighted, with fog further hampering visibility, but as he pulled in behind the truck Robertson was certain it was Sheffield’s. He keyed his radio mic and called to his backup. “Andy, y’all come on down here. I think I’ve got ‘em.”

A female passenger climbed out and headed toward a trailer a few feet away. The male driver, wearing a baseball cap, stepped out, and Robertson recognized him as the fugitive he was hunting.

Unbeknown to Robertson, his radio call had not been heard back at the country store. The other officers were standing outside their units chatting, out of earshot. Robertson was alone in the dark, unmonitored, with an offender who had some remarkably violent entries on his rap sheet. In a drug dispute, Robertson recalls, “Sheffield once fired 90 rounds from a Mac-10 into a mobile home with a woman and 2 children inside. I was always wary when I dealt with him because I knew he could be violent when trapped.”

As Robertson approached him, “he immediately recognized me. His eyes got as big as saucers.” Not knowing who or what might be in the trailer house, the investigator wanted to take the suspect into custody before he could flee there. Robertson grabbed both of Sheffield’s hands and placed them on top of the truck cab.

“I have warrants for you,” Robertson told him. “You’re under arrest.”

“No,” Sheffield retorted. “I’m not goin’.”

“Immediately, he spins 180 degrees right into me,” Robertson says…and the fight of his life–and for his life–was on.

Robertson is no cream puff. At 6 ft. 3 in. and 225 lbs., he can bench press more than 300 lbs. Sheffield was smaller, about 5 ft. 11 in. and 210 lbs., but he fought with uncommon ferocity. Later, toxicology reports would reveal that he had high levels of alcohol and cocaine in his blood that night.

As they grappled beside the truck, Sheffield repeatedly tried to grab Robertson’s holstered 9mm Sig-Sauer 226, Robertson says. Robertson, who’d graduated first in his academy class in 1997 and is well-versed in defensive tactics, managed to repel him with knee strikes. But even though he was driving his knee with all his strength into Sheffield’s abdomen and groin, the attacker wouldn’t go to the ground where Robertson could get him handcuffed.

“There was no sound, no weakening, no fazing him,” Robertson says. “I was kneeing him as hard as I could, yelling at him to get down and stop resisting, and he just kept staring a hole right through me with his eyes wide open. I never saw anyone who could stand such punishment. I couldn’t believe it.”

As the struggle sustained, Robertson could feel himself growing tired and winded. “I wasn’t sure how long I could last,” he says.

After one attempted gun grab, he shouted at Sheffield, “I will shoot you! Get on the ground!”

Sheffield snarled back, “Shoot me, damn it, shoot me!”

But Robertson didn’t–until he felt Sheffield’s hand clamp firmly on his pistol butt and start to pull the gun out. “I felt his intentions were to kill me,” Robertson says. He trapped Sheffield’s hand, wrenched the Sig away from him, shoved him back, and ordered him to the ground at gunpoint. “When he started toward me again,” Robertson fired 2 rounds at him from a distance of 6 to 8 feet.

Both struck, but still Sheffield did not fall. Instead, he ran toward a tractor shed some 30 to 40 feet away, and disappeared into the darkness.

Robertson pursued with his pistol out, unintentionally firing one round into the ground as he ran before realizing that his finger was still on the trigger. When he reached the shed, he rounded the corner–and before he could stop ran smack into William Sheffield, crouched in a fighting stance. “That shocked me,” Robertson says. “I expected him to be on the ground or gone.”

He was jerked to reality when Sheffield instantly clutched his gun. Robertson whipped his gun hand back, simultaneously shoved Sheffield away and fired another 2 rounds. This time the suspect fell face down in the dirt. “I could see he was bleeding,” Robertson remembers. “He tried to get up, but he couldn’t move his legs.” Sheffield bled out at the scene.

By the time the suspect went down, approximately 2 1/2 minutes had elapsed since Robertson’s futile call for backup.

Operating in what he considered a state of shock–”I couldn’t believe I actually had to shoot somebody!”–Robertson handcuffed the suspect as a precaution, radioed a call for backup and an ambulance (the officers down the road heard this one), dealt with Sheffield’s hysterical girlfriend and a male resident who emerged from the trailer house, and tried to get his hyperventilation under control.

Arriving responders found him by his car, “squatting down, holding his head and feeling extremely upset and extremely tired.” Robertson says his chest “felt like it was in a vise.” He had trouble breathing and couldn’t stop coughing. Concerned about his heart, EMTs gave him nitroglycerine for chest pains. Only later would he learn he was not experiencing a heart attack.

“My mind was just spinning,” Robertson says. “During the fights there were times when things were happening so fast I couldn’t comprehend what was going on. Other times things happened in such slow motion they didn’t seem real. I’d never been in a situation where all that stress was thrust on me at once.”

En route by ambulance to the Carolina Pines Regional Medical Center in nearby Hartsville, Robertson cell phoned his wife, Donna, a retired lieutenant with Hartsville PD and now a private investigator. When she met him at the hospital, she had in tow a friend and neighbor, attorney Paul Cannerella.

Meanwhile, the Chesterfield County SD had contacted a state investigative agency to conduct the investigation of Robertson’s shooting. It was a resident agent from that department who showed up at the ER, expecting to take a statement from the highly stressed survivor. “Not tonight,” Cannerella told him; Robertson was in “no condition” to deal with something that important.

By then, it was well after midnight on Friday, Dec. 30. The extended New Year’s weekend lay ahead. Cannerella promised that when normal routines resumed on Tuesday, Jan. 3, Robertson would have a full written statement ready for pickup at the lawyer’s office. And he did. But no one came by to get it, and no contact was made for an interview.

On Wednesday, he found out why, when he was arrested and charged with voluntary manslaughter. Sheffield’s girlfriend had told authorities she’d seen the entire encounter and that Robertson had gunned down Sheffield without provocation as he tried to run away.

The male resident of the mobile home contradicted her, insisting she had run inside the trailer before any shooting started and stayed there until afterward. When she first rushed in, he claimed, she told him Sheffield and a cop were fighting over the officer’s gun. Later it was established that from her vantage point she could not have seen everything that took place.

The circuit solicitor, however, seemed fixated on the bullet holes in the suspect’s back, and determined that Robertson face criminal penalties.

“I was just stunned,” Robertson says. “It was bad enough to go through the shooting, but to be charged and arrested without my side of the story being heard–how could things get to this point? My wife just went to pieces. It was my worst nightmare.”

Or so it seemed, until the solicitor went before the next grand jury and got the stakes upped significantly–to an indictment for murder. Now if found guilty, Robertson could be sentenced to life in prison. “I was livid,” he says. “I felt they’d have a hard time proving voluntary manslaughter, much less murder, which requires malice aforethought. I felt like they were just gunning for me.”

Leave a Reply


  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Effective date: January 06, 2019

Force Science Institute, Ltd. (“us”, “we”, or “our”) operates the https://www.forcescience.org/ website (hereinafter referred to as the “Service”).

This page informs you of our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of personal data when you use our Service and the choices you have associated with that data. Our Privacy Policy for Force Science Institute, Ltd. is based on the Privacy Policy Template from Privacy Policies.

We use your data to provide and improve the Service. By using the Service, you agree to the collection and use of information in accordance with this policy. Unless otherwise defined in this Privacy Policy, the terms used in this Privacy Policy have the same meanings as in our Terms and Conditions, accessible from https://www.forcescience.org/

Information Collection And Use

We collect several different types of information for various purposes to provide and improve our Service to you.

Types of Data Collected

Personal Data

While using our Service, we may ask you to provide us with certain personally identifiable information that can be used to contact or identify you (“Personal Data”). Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to:

  • Email address
  • First name and last name
  • Phone number
  • Address, State, Province, ZIP/Postal code, City
  • Cookies and Usage Data

Usage Data

We may also collect information on how the Service is accessed and used (“Usage Data”). This Usage Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol address (e.g. IP address), browser type, browser version, the pages of our Service that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages, unique device identifiers and other diagnostic data.

Tracking & Cookies Data

We use cookies and similar tracking technologies to track the activity on our Service and hold certain information.

Cookies are files with small amount of data which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a website and stored on your device. Tracking technologies also used are beacons, tags, and scripts to collect and track information and to improve and analyze our Service.

You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our Service. You can learn more how to manage cookies in the Browser Cookies Guide.

Examples of Cookies we use:

  • Session Cookies. We use Session Cookies to operate our Service.
  • Preference Cookies. We use Preference Cookies to remember your preferences and various settings.
  • Security Cookies. We use Security Cookies for security purposes.

Use of Data

Force Science Institute, Ltd. uses the collected data for various purposes:

  • To provide and maintain the Service
  • To notify you about changes to our Service
  • To allow you to participate in interactive features of our Service when you choose to do so
  • To provide customer care and support
  • To provide analysis or valuable information so that we can improve the Service
  • To monitor the usage of the Service
  • To detect, prevent and address technical issues

Transfer Of Data

Your information, including Personal Data, may be transferred to — and maintained on — computers located outside of your state, province, country or other governmental jurisdiction where the data protection laws may differ than those from your jurisdiction.

If you are located outside United States and choose to provide information to us, please note that we transfer the data, including Personal Data, to United States and process it there.

Your consent to this Privacy Policy followed by your submission of such information represents your agreement to that transfer.

Force Science Institute, Ltd. will take all steps reasonably necessary to ensure that your data is treated securely and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and no transfer of your Personal Data will take place to an organization or a country unless there are adequate controls in place including the security of your data and other personal information.

Disclosure Of Data

Legal Requirements

Force Science Institute, Ltd. may disclose your Personal Data in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to:

  • To comply with a legal obligation
  • To protect and defend the rights or property of Force Science Institute, Ltd.
  • To prevent or investigate possible wrongdoing in connection with the Service
  • To protect the personal safety of users of the Service or the public
  • To protect against legal liability

Security Of Data

The security of your data is important to us, but remember that no method of transmission over the Internet, or method of electronic storage is 100% secure. While we strive to use commercially acceptable means to protect your Personal Data, we cannot guarantee its absolute security.

Service Providers

We may employ third party companies and individuals to facilitate our Service (“Service Providers”), to provide the Service on our behalf, to perform Service-related services or to assist us in analyzing how our Service is used.

These third parties have access to your Personal Data only to perform these tasks on our behalf and are obligated not to disclose or use it for any other purpose.


We may use third-party Service Providers to monitor and analyze the use of our Service.

  • Google AnalyticsGoogle Analytics is a web analytics service offered by Google that tracks and reports website traffic. Google uses the data collected to track and monitor the use of our Service. This data is shared with other Google services. Google may use the collected data to contextualize and personalize the ads of its own advertising network.You can opt-out of having made your activity on the Service available to Google Analytics by installing the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on. The add-on prevents the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js, analytics.js, and dc.js) from sharing information with Google Analytics about visits activity.For more information on the privacy practices of Google, please visit the Google Privacy & Terms web page: https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en

Links To Other Sites

Our Service may contain links to other sites that are not operated by us. If you click on a third party link, you will be directed to that third party’s site. We strongly advise you to review the Privacy Policy of every site you visit.

We have no control over and assume no responsibility for the content, privacy policies or practices of any third party sites or services.

Children’s Privacy

Our Service does not address anyone under the age of 18 (“Children”).

We do not knowingly collect personally identifiable information from anyone under the age of 18. If you are a parent or guardian and you are aware that your Children has provided us with Personal Data, please contact us. If we become aware that we have collected Personal Data from children without verification of parental consent, we take steps to remove that information from our servers.

Changes To This Privacy Policy

We may update our Privacy Policy from time to time. We will notify you of any changes by posting the new Privacy Policy on this page.

We will let you know via email and/or a prominent notice on our Service, prior to the change becoming effective and update the “effective date” at the top of this Privacy Policy.

You are advised to review this Privacy Policy periodically for any changes. Changes to this Privacy Policy are effective when they are posted on this page.

Contact Us

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, please contact us:

  • By email: support@forcescience.org
  • By visiting this page on our website: https://www.forcescience.org/contact
  • By phone number: 866-683-1944
  • By mail: Force Science Institute, Ltd.