Dan Lovelace’s Battle Back To Law Enforcement

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Dan Lovelace has been to the dark side of the law enforcement moon. Targeted by a prescription drug abuser who tried to run him over. Swirled into a media frenzy when he shot and killed her. Fired by his agency and brought to trial for murder by a zealous prosecutor. Shunned like a leper by a seemingly endless chain of agencies when he tried to find work after being acquitted. Reduced to cutting grass at some points to help keep his family fed. Even haunted by thoughts of self-destruction at his lowest point.

Now after nearly 7 nightmare years of struggling for a chance to rebuild what was once a shining reputation in policing, Lovelace has pinned on a badge again and is seeing a glimmer of daylight.

Last month [7/09], after graduating from a 9-week academy, he started work at the age of 44 as a detention officer for the Pinal County SO in Florence, AZ. His job, in uniform but unarmed, is to help with “the care, safety, and control” of male and female inmates in the 1,650-bed county jail. His graduation from training came exactly 5 years and 1 day after he was found not guilty of criminal charges that could have sent him to prison for 24 years.

“Vindication was a long time coming,” he told Force Science News. “I’m glad to finally have somebody [Sheriff Paul Babeu] who saw my case for what it was and will allow me to prove myself. That’s all I ever wanted.”

Lovelace’s shooting made national headlines when it occurred in October 2002 in the Phoenix suburb of Chandler. Then a motor officer for Chandler PD with nearly 5 years on the job, Lovelace responded to a drive-up pharmacy window where an attractive young housewife with her infant in the backseat had tried to pass a forged prescription for painkillers. In a desperate bid to escape, she peeled rubber, knocked over his parked bike, then turned and tried to run over Lovelace himself. He fired a single, fatal round that stopped her.

“It should have been cleared as a righteous shooting,” says Dr. Bill Lewinski, executive director for the Force Science Research Center, who testified as an expert witness at the officer’s trial. “Instead, it became a classic example of a department and a prosecutor’s office hanging an officer out to dry in a politically charged atmosphere, fueled by media hysteria.”

Lovelace was charged with second-degree murder and abruptly terminated. A settlement of more than $1.94 million was hurriedly paid to the dead woman’s survivors even before his trial was held.

Today, his case is dissected during FSRC’s Force Science Certification Course for its many investigative and prosecutorial shortcomings. “Errors were made that involved profound misunderstandings of human behavior in rapidly unfolding, high-stress encounters,” Lewinski declares. “It seemed as if conclusions about the shooting were made prematurely by the powers that be and then the facts were framed to conform to their view.”

One example was the prosecution’s dogged effort to discredit Lovelace’s version of the shooting, based of where the spent shell landed when ejected from his pistol. Tests by Lewinski and other FSRC researchers proved that the prosecution’s premise was bogus—and aided materially in Lovelace’s acquittal at a jury trial in 2004. [For details, see Force Science News Transmission #1, sent 9/17/04.]

Lovelace characterizes the case as “wrongful prosecution. They had evidence of my innocence right before them,” he says. “They wanted me to take a plea. If I’d say it was an accidental shooting and plead to negligent homicide, there’d be no jail time—but I’d never work as a police officer again. I’d have to lie to protect myself. I wouldn’t do it.”

Despite his full exoneration in court, Chandler refused to rehire him after the trial and the prosecutor still kept him on a list of “police officers deemed to be untruthful.” The Arizona POST board, however, after conducting a thorough investigation of its own, maintained his peace officer certification. So he figured he’d be able to land somewhere as an LEO before long. After all, he had graduated first in his academy class, had been named Rookie Officer of the Year, and had racked up an impressive record of achievement as a hard-charging, 5%er professional since then during his career in Chandler.

His optimism was soon shaken, and a disheartening pattern of rejection set in. “When I applied to the Highway Patrol,” Lovelace says, “I passed the physical, a written test, a commanders’ review, a ride along, a polygraph exam, an IQ test, and a psych exam and I heard that I was at or near the top of the list to be hired. But then I got a letter that said I didn’t meet their requirements. No further explanation. I could reapply in 6 years.”

More applications…more rejections. At a major sheriff’s office he was told that “the sheriff said not to hire fired officers,” even though there were already fired officers on his roster. “I went to a whole bunch of smaller agencies, some in little mining towns,” he says. “Some told me to not even bother filling out an application, which violates equal opportunity employment laws.”

He tried departments out of state, tried departments on Indian reservations, even tried to volunteer as a reserve officer, thinking that might be a foot in the door. Nothing. “I told myself, ‘Just be patient, keep trying, and persevere. If you keep trying, someone will give you a chance.’ ”

Meanwhile, he scrambled for whatever work he could get to bring in money. He bought a lawn mower and started cutting grass, “just like I’d done in high school”—and just as Karl Hettinger, the surviving officer in the infamous Onion Field case had done in L.A. decades before. He hurried over with his chainsaw when he heard of people with dead trees. He taught history to “at-risk” kids on one of the reservations (but not until parents had skeptically ok’d his hiring in a special meeting). He put together safety and legal manuals for a repo company. He peddled services for cleaning cooking grease out of exhaust hoods in restaurant kitchens. He moved furniture, he painted, he fixed roofs.

Even with his wife working full time, it was a struggle. Ironically, she was employed then—as she still is—as a dispatcher for Chandler PD. “It was tough on her,” Lovelace says. Officers on the department tended to choose sides regarding the controversy that clung to him, with even some he considered close friends lining up against him.

“They’d tell her, ‘You should divorce him. How can you live with a man like that? He’s a killer, a rogue.’ She’d hear one thing at work, and I’d tell her another at home.

“She didn’t know how to deal with what I was going through. I was battling with emotions I didn’t even know I had. I was afraid for my family. What’s going to happen to us? Why don’t people believe me?” In one stretch of 38 days, he says, “I got no real sleep.”

In his darkest hour, Lovelace candidly admits that he considered taking his own life. He dug out old notes on suicide he’d saved from his academy days and realized he fitted the symptoms. He mulled “ways and means” and says he could “easily have done the deed 10 times over. You want to just crumble to the ground and give up.”

But then, he says, in a supernatural moment “God talked to me. He said, ‘I love you. Stay the course. Stay tough.’ And I did.”

Given all that the job has cost him, why did Lovelace so fervently pursue reentry into law enforcement? Why not just “back off and hide?” as he puts it. He was so successful selling the hood-cleaning services, for example, that the owner of the company wanted to bring him into partnership. So it wasn’t a matter of money.

“I took an oath to serve and protect in November 1996 when I was first sworn in as a police officer,” Lovelace explains. “When I took that oath, I meant it. It explains why I do what I do. No one should be astounded that I want to get back in. Criminals are still out there, and I’m a man of my word.

“If I give up, then the people who broke that oath for me win. They took something away from me that I treasure, when I didn’t do anything wrong. That has to be rectified. Good should always triumph over evil. And for good to win, you don’t give up, you don’t run away. You do what it takes to come out on top.”

The break Lovelace had longed for came at the ballot box last November. Paul Babeu, who’d been a new officer on Chandler PD at the time of Lovelace’s trial, was elected sheriff of nearby Pinal County, the fastest growing county in Arizona, with the motto “Wide open opportunity.”

Like Lovelace, Babeu is an achiever, voted #1 Overall Police Recruit in his academy class and eventually elected president of the Chandler Law Enforcement Assn., the police union. As candidate for sheriff, he campaigned on a platform of reforming the Office with “honest, independent, and accountable” service. He took command in January, and Lovelace applied for a job. He’s lost count of how many applications he’d submitted to law enforcement agencies across the years before that.

With slots open for detention officers, Babeu was more than willing to give him a shot. Out of curiosity and support, he had attended portions of Lovelace’s trial and as the evidence unfolded, he’d become convinced that the case “resulted from a prosecutor that was overzealous and an investigation that was clearly flawed. The department’s command staff, the prosecutor, and the media were all singing in a chorus that was contrary to the evidence. It was a train wreck from Day One.”

He told Force Science News: “I tried to take out all the emotion and just look at the facts, and I believe if I was in the same place as Dan Lovelace in that shooting I may have reacted in the very same way he did.”

In giving Lovelace the nod, Babeu told him that he expected him to graduate at the top of his corrections academy class. The first day of firearms training, Lovelace shot at the expert level. He scored highest in the class on DT. He won honors for physical fitness. He was selected to be class speaker at commencement. And he missed graduating as valedictorian by 1 percentage point; he came in second.

At this writing, his assignment is in the maximum security section of the jail, overseeing homicide arrestees and other violent offenders. “It’s a slower pace than I’m used to,” he says, “but I like it. I’m serving the public by preventing escapes, and I’m a police officer per se in the facility by preventing crimes between inmates.” Even so, he would welcome the opportunity eventually to get back to his first love, uniformed patrol.

Predictably, the media have caught up with him. Arizona papers have run worrisome stories about his “controversial” hiring, with concerns expressed about his liability and reliability. “It’s old hat to me,” Lovelace says. Babeu is prepared to withstand the heat. “Dan will do an exemplary job,” he says. “I know in my heart and mind that hiring him was the best thing to do. I hope his worst days are behind him.”

FSN asked Lovelace what he would like to share with other officers, in terms of lessons learned from his long ordeal. He offers these suggestions:

  1. “Don’t assume that your department is looking out for your best interests” in a controversial situation. Study your rights, know them well, and take a proactive role in defending yourself.
  2. “Excel in everything you can, so when your time comes your reputation precedes you. When the jury heard me testify, my word still carried some weight, even with everything that had been done to discredit me.”
  3. Be prepared to find out who your true friends are. “It really hurt to see some officers turn their backs on me. I’d been to their weddings, visited their wives in the hospital when they had babies, backed them up on calls. On the other hand, there were some friends who stuck with my wife and me from the very beginning up to this moment. I could never put into words what that has meant to us.”
  4. “It’s important to have a life outside of law enforcement. When you come home at the end of your shift and take off that uniform, be a husband, be a father, not a cop. Some people attach themselves to the badge so fanatically that if they have to leave it, it takes their life with it.”
  5. Have faith. “When my career failed me, some friends failed me, I still had God and my family. If I had had to go to prison, God would have gone with me and my family would have helped me do whatever I had to do to survive.”

GDPR

  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Effective date: January 06, 2019

Force Science Institute, Ltd. (“us”, “we”, or “our”) operates the https://www.forcescience.org/ website (hereinafter referred to as the “Service”).

This page informs you of our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of personal data when you use our Service and the choices you have associated with that data. Our Privacy Policy for Force Science Institute, Ltd. is based on the Privacy Policy Template from Privacy Policies.

We use your data to provide and improve the Service. By using the Service, you agree to the collection and use of information in accordance with this policy. Unless otherwise defined in this Privacy Policy, the terms used in this Privacy Policy have the same meanings as in our Terms and Conditions, accessible from https://www.forcescience.org/

Information Collection And Use

We collect several different types of information for various purposes to provide and improve our Service to you.

Types of Data Collected

Personal Data

While using our Service, we may ask you to provide us with certain personally identifiable information that can be used to contact or identify you (“Personal Data”). Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to:

  • Email address
  • First name and last name
  • Phone number
  • Address, State, Province, ZIP/Postal code, City
  • Cookies and Usage Data

Usage Data

We may also collect information on how the Service is accessed and used (“Usage Data”). This Usage Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol address (e.g. IP address), browser type, browser version, the pages of our Service that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages, unique device identifiers and other diagnostic data.

Tracking & Cookies Data

We use cookies and similar tracking technologies to track the activity on our Service and hold certain information.

Cookies are files with small amount of data which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a website and stored on your device. Tracking technologies also used are beacons, tags, and scripts to collect and track information and to improve and analyze our Service.

You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our Service. You can learn more how to manage cookies in the Browser Cookies Guide.

Examples of Cookies we use:

  • Session Cookies. We use Session Cookies to operate our Service.
  • Preference Cookies. We use Preference Cookies to remember your preferences and various settings.
  • Security Cookies. We use Security Cookies for security purposes.

Use of Data

Force Science Institute, Ltd. uses the collected data for various purposes:

  • To provide and maintain the Service
  • To notify you about changes to our Service
  • To allow you to participate in interactive features of our Service when you choose to do so
  • To provide customer care and support
  • To provide analysis or valuable information so that we can improve the Service
  • To monitor the usage of the Service
  • To detect, prevent and address technical issues

Transfer Of Data

Your information, including Personal Data, may be transferred to — and maintained on — computers located outside of your state, province, country or other governmental jurisdiction where the data protection laws may differ than those from your jurisdiction.

If you are located outside United States and choose to provide information to us, please note that we transfer the data, including Personal Data, to United States and process it there.

Your consent to this Privacy Policy followed by your submission of such information represents your agreement to that transfer.

Force Science Institute, Ltd. will take all steps reasonably necessary to ensure that your data is treated securely and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and no transfer of your Personal Data will take place to an organization or a country unless there are adequate controls in place including the security of your data and other personal information.

Disclosure Of Data

Legal Requirements

Force Science Institute, Ltd. may disclose your Personal Data in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to:

  • To comply with a legal obligation
  • To protect and defend the rights or property of Force Science Institute, Ltd.
  • To prevent or investigate possible wrongdoing in connection with the Service
  • To protect the personal safety of users of the Service or the public
  • To protect against legal liability

Security Of Data

The security of your data is important to us, but remember that no method of transmission over the Internet, or method of electronic storage is 100% secure. While we strive to use commercially acceptable means to protect your Personal Data, we cannot guarantee its absolute security.

Service Providers

We may employ third party companies and individuals to facilitate our Service (“Service Providers”), to provide the Service on our behalf, to perform Service-related services or to assist us in analyzing how our Service is used.

These third parties have access to your Personal Data only to perform these tasks on our behalf and are obligated not to disclose or use it for any other purpose.

Analytics

We may use third-party Service Providers to monitor and analyze the use of our Service.

  • Google AnalyticsGoogle Analytics is a web analytics service offered by Google that tracks and reports website traffic. Google uses the data collected to track and monitor the use of our Service. This data is shared with other Google services. Google may use the collected data to contextualize and personalize the ads of its own advertising network.You can opt-out of having made your activity on the Service available to Google Analytics by installing the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on. The add-on prevents the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js, analytics.js, and dc.js) from sharing information with Google Analytics about visits activity.For more information on the privacy practices of Google, please visit the Google Privacy & Terms web page: https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en

Links To Other Sites

Our Service may contain links to other sites that are not operated by us. If you click on a third party link, you will be directed to that third party’s site. We strongly advise you to review the Privacy Policy of every site you visit.

We have no control over and assume no responsibility for the content, privacy policies or practices of any third party sites or services.

Children’s Privacy

Our Service does not address anyone under the age of 18 (“Children”).

We do not knowingly collect personally identifiable information from anyone under the age of 18. If you are a parent or guardian and you are aware that your Children has provided us with Personal Data, please contact us. If we become aware that we have collected Personal Data from children without verification of parental consent, we take steps to remove that information from our servers.

Changes To This Privacy Policy

We may update our Privacy Policy from time to time. We will notify you of any changes by posting the new Privacy Policy on this page.

We will let you know via email and/or a prominent notice on our Service, prior to the change becoming effective and update the “effective date” at the top of this Privacy Policy.

You are advised to review this Privacy Policy periodically for any changes. Changes to this Privacy Policy are effective when they are posted on this page.

Contact Us

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, please contact us:

  • By email: [email protected]
  • By visiting this page on our website: https://www.forcescience.org/contact
  • By phone number: 866-683-1944
  • By mail: Force Science Institute, Ltd.