Can You Aid This Research Into Police-On-Police Shootings?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Have you ever been confronted by another officer who mistook you for a suspect when you were out of uniform?

Have you ever been the challenging officer in such a situation?

Do you have ideas for tactics or training that might prevent tragic consequences in these dicey, life-threatening circumstances?

If so, a governor’s task force in New York state wants to hear from you.

To access a personal, first-of-its-kind survey in which you can register your comments and experiences, you can paste this address into your browser:


What you submit could help save your life or that of a fellow LEO in the future.

The task force will also be receiving expert scientific insights into the so-called “friendly fire” phenomenon from Dr. Bill Lewinski, executive director of the Force Science Institute and the Force Science Research Center.

“A confrontation in which one officer is mistakenly shot by another is the ultimate tragedy in law enforcement,” Lewinski told Force Science News. “In the emotional turmoil that follows, the powerful sociological and psychological influences that were involved are often ignored or misunderstood.

“Fortunately, fatalities from police-on-police shootings are relatively rare, but chances of them occurring are omnipresent in today’s world of complex, rapidly evolving street encounters. If the important work of this task force can save even one officer’s life, the effort will have been well worth it.”

Research by the New York State Police-on-Police Shootings Task Force officially got underway last September at the direction of Gov. David Paterson, after the slayings of 2 officers as a result of mistaken identity.

Last May, an off-duty NYPD officer, Omar Edwards, was shot dead by a fellow officer as he chased a suspect who had broken into Edwards’ car. In 2008, another off-duty LEO, Christopher Ridley of Mt. Vernon (NY) PD, was shot and killed by officers from another agency as he was effecting an arrest after witnessing a street brawl.

Each victim officer, dressed in civilian clothing, had his gun out at the time of the shooting and, according to witnesses, did not obey commands to release the weapon. Because both officers were black and shooting officers were white, intense community speculation regarding “racial stereotyping” ensued.

In an effort to unemotionally “examine the issues and implications arising” from “friendly fire” encounters, Paterson appointed the 10-member task force to:

  • determine the “frequency and characteristics of police-on-police confrontations”;
  • plumb the knowledge of law enforcement professionals and researchers about “ways police officers can mitigate the risks involved”;
  • examine “published research on the psychology of split-second decision-making,” including any “impact of unconscious or ‘implicit’ racial bias”; and
  • identify any “technological innovations that can help to reduce” such incidents.

The inquiry was to “focus on mistaken identity confrontations,” both fatal and nonfatal, “with an emphasis on incidents between on-duty and off-duty officers, between uniformed and undercover officers, and between officers of different races, nationalities, and ethnicities.”

The task force is chaired by Christopher Stone, a CJ professor at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government. Among its members, professional law enforcement experience is the most heavily represented background. Members include the public safety commissioner for Westchester County (NY), the chief of San Francisco PD, a former U.S. attorney, a deputy commissioner for NYPD, a former SAC for the NY DEA office, and the former chief of Detroit PD. Representatives of the urban ministry and civil rights organizations are also included.

According to the force’s executive director Damon Hewitt and research director Jim Gilmer, the group so far has documented details of 26 fatal police-on-police mistaken-identity shootings in the U.S. in the last 29 years. “Nonfatal confrontations, including incidents where weapons are drawn but no shots are fired, happen with far greater frequency,” Hewitt believes, “but most go unreported because there is no mechanism for recording them.”

“It is not uncommon for an officer to have had a gunpoint encounter with another officer,” Gilmer says. “Some have been on both sides of the fence. The risk is very much there, especially for off-duty officers, it seems. In fact, fatal shootings of off-duty officers seem to have been occurring with increasing frequency during the latter half of the time period we’ve been looking at.”

In hopes of turning up additional examples of encounters, both fatal and “near miss,” as well as fresh thinking on what might be done about the problem, the task force has been surveying a number of law enforcement constituencies. Now it is inviting readers of Force Science News and of our strategic partner PoliceOne.com to participate in its personal-experience survey to further enhance its database.

In the survey, accessed through the link noted earlier, you will be asked to describe in your own words details of what you experienced in up to 3 police-on-police confrontations if you have been an involved officer. “Your observations are vital information,” the task force notes, “so that we can gain a better understanding of how confrontations occur.”

Among information sought is: What was the situation immediately before the confrontation? What was the visibility and lighting? In what type of location or premises did the encounter occur? Did you notice the race or ethnicity of other officers involved? What did you and other involved officers say or do? Did any of these actions help to defuse the situation? Did this confrontation result in a lawsuit or in disciplinary action? And so on.

In addition, you will be asked to identify specific strategies you or your agency have developed—or that you think should be developed—to address confrontation situations. Plus you’ll be asked about any training you have received on this subject during your career, as well as questions about your law enforcement background and personal demographics.

Your participation in the survey is strictly anonymous, and you are asked not to include names of involved officers and agencies.

Researchers hope to cut off survey responses at the end of January, so your prompt attention to this will be appreciated, Gilmer says.

By sometime in February, the task force hopes to make public the verified information it has compiled on all known mistaken-identity fatalities since 1981, including narratives of precisely what happened in each case. Then in early March, it expects to publish a final report that highlights its conclusions and recommendations.

Papers from experts and others who have analyzed the subject from various perspectives and who have been asked to serve as advisors to the task force will be included in the final report. As one of about a dozen such advisors, Lewinski’s observations will be among those incorporated.

His participation in the task force’s work was recommended by Mark Fettinger, supervisor of public safety programs in the New York Division of Criminal Justice Services, who heard him speak about Force Science research at an IALEFI conference a few years ago.

“We want to include an understanding of the science behind these incidents—the sociological and psychological factors that affect assessment of risk and split-second decision-making, for example,” Hewitt explains.

“Dr. Lewinski is an internationally recognized leader in the field,” Gilmer says. “The work he has done will be of tremendous value in helping us interpret and articulate our findings and prioritize our recommendations for training and policy.”

Force Science News will report on further developments as they occur. Meanwhile, please share your knowledge in the survey.

“More must be done to protect our law enforcement officers,” Gov. Paterson says. “I am confident that the work of the task force will gain not only considerable insight into this issue, but also meaningful direction on how to move forward.”

Leave a Reply


  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Effective date: January 06, 2019

Force Science Institute, Ltd. (“us”, “we”, or “our”) operates the https://www.forcescience.org/ website (hereinafter referred to as the “Service”).

This page informs you of our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of personal data when you use our Service and the choices you have associated with that data. Our Privacy Policy for Force Science Institute, Ltd. is based on the Privacy Policy Template from Privacy Policies.

We use your data to provide and improve the Service. By using the Service, you agree to the collection and use of information in accordance with this policy. Unless otherwise defined in this Privacy Policy, the terms used in this Privacy Policy have the same meanings as in our Terms and Conditions, accessible from https://www.forcescience.org/

Information Collection And Use

We collect several different types of information for various purposes to provide and improve our Service to you.

Types of Data Collected

Personal Data

While using our Service, we may ask you to provide us with certain personally identifiable information that can be used to contact or identify you (“Personal Data”). Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to:

  • Email address
  • First name and last name
  • Phone number
  • Address, State, Province, ZIP/Postal code, City
  • Cookies and Usage Data

Usage Data

We may also collect information on how the Service is accessed and used (“Usage Data”). This Usage Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol address (e.g. IP address), browser type, browser version, the pages of our Service that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages, unique device identifiers and other diagnostic data.

Tracking & Cookies Data

We use cookies and similar tracking technologies to track the activity on our Service and hold certain information.

Cookies are files with small amount of data which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a website and stored on your device. Tracking technologies also used are beacons, tags, and scripts to collect and track information and to improve and analyze our Service.

You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our Service. You can learn more how to manage cookies in the Browser Cookies Guide.

Examples of Cookies we use:

  • Session Cookies. We use Session Cookies to operate our Service.
  • Preference Cookies. We use Preference Cookies to remember your preferences and various settings.
  • Security Cookies. We use Security Cookies for security purposes.

Use of Data

Force Science Institute, Ltd. uses the collected data for various purposes:

  • To provide and maintain the Service
  • To notify you about changes to our Service
  • To allow you to participate in interactive features of our Service when you choose to do so
  • To provide customer care and support
  • To provide analysis or valuable information so that we can improve the Service
  • To monitor the usage of the Service
  • To detect, prevent and address technical issues

Transfer Of Data

Your information, including Personal Data, may be transferred to — and maintained on — computers located outside of your state, province, country or other governmental jurisdiction where the data protection laws may differ than those from your jurisdiction.

If you are located outside United States and choose to provide information to us, please note that we transfer the data, including Personal Data, to United States and process it there.

Your consent to this Privacy Policy followed by your submission of such information represents your agreement to that transfer.

Force Science Institute, Ltd. will take all steps reasonably necessary to ensure that your data is treated securely and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and no transfer of your Personal Data will take place to an organization or a country unless there are adequate controls in place including the security of your data and other personal information.

Disclosure Of Data

Legal Requirements

Force Science Institute, Ltd. may disclose your Personal Data in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to:

  • To comply with a legal obligation
  • To protect and defend the rights or property of Force Science Institute, Ltd.
  • To prevent or investigate possible wrongdoing in connection with the Service
  • To protect the personal safety of users of the Service or the public
  • To protect against legal liability

Security Of Data

The security of your data is important to us, but remember that no method of transmission over the Internet, or method of electronic storage is 100% secure. While we strive to use commercially acceptable means to protect your Personal Data, we cannot guarantee its absolute security.

Service Providers

We may employ third party companies and individuals to facilitate our Service (“Service Providers”), to provide the Service on our behalf, to perform Service-related services or to assist us in analyzing how our Service is used.

These third parties have access to your Personal Data only to perform these tasks on our behalf and are obligated not to disclose or use it for any other purpose.


We may use third-party Service Providers to monitor and analyze the use of our Service.

  • Google AnalyticsGoogle Analytics is a web analytics service offered by Google that tracks and reports website traffic. Google uses the data collected to track and monitor the use of our Service. This data is shared with other Google services. Google may use the collected data to contextualize and personalize the ads of its own advertising network.You can opt-out of having made your activity on the Service available to Google Analytics by installing the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on. The add-on prevents the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js, analytics.js, and dc.js) from sharing information with Google Analytics about visits activity.For more information on the privacy practices of Google, please visit the Google Privacy & Terms web page: https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en

Links To Other Sites

Our Service may contain links to other sites that are not operated by us. If you click on a third party link, you will be directed to that third party’s site. We strongly advise you to review the Privacy Policy of every site you visit.

We have no control over and assume no responsibility for the content, privacy policies or practices of any third party sites or services.

Children’s Privacy

Our Service does not address anyone under the age of 18 (“Children”).

We do not knowingly collect personally identifiable information from anyone under the age of 18. If you are a parent or guardian and you are aware that your Children has provided us with Personal Data, please contact us. If we become aware that we have collected Personal Data from children without verification of parental consent, we take steps to remove that information from our servers.

Changes To This Privacy Policy

We may update our Privacy Policy from time to time. We will notify you of any changes by posting the new Privacy Policy on this page.

We will let you know via email and/or a prominent notice on our Service, prior to the change becoming effective and update the “effective date” at the top of this Privacy Policy.

You are advised to review this Privacy Policy periodically for any changes. Changes to this Privacy Policy are effective when they are posted on this page.

Contact Us

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, please contact us:

  • By email: support@forcescience.org
  • By visiting this page on our website: https://www.forcescience.org/contact
  • By phone number: 866-683-1944
  • By mail: Force Science Institute, Ltd.