New Report Underscores Credibility Of Force Science’S Shell-Ejection Studies

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Contrary to persistent myth, where a cartridge case lands when it’s ejected from a semiautomatic pistol is not a reliable indicator of where the shooter was standing when the gun was fired.

That fact has been scientifically confirmed by the Force Science Institute in a series of research experiments starting back in 2004. “Yet some investigators and firearms experts continue to use the location of spent casings as critical reference points in reconstructing shooting scenes,” says FSI’s executive director, Dr. Bill Lewinski.

“In the most tragic instances, this spurious ‘evidence’ has been cited in court to challenge officers’ statements about where they were positioned in controversial officer-involved shootings. And when such testimony is accepted as dependable, officers can suffer grave injustices.”

[One example of a trial in which cartridge-case placement became a pivotal issue involved Arizona officer Dan Lovelace, whose courtroom ordeal, firing, and painful aftermath were covered in Force Science News transmissions #1 and #129 (Click here to go to the FS News Archive) This case is also thoroughly critiqued in the Institute’s course for certification in Force Science Analysis.]

Now it will be easier for conscientious investigators, expert witnesses, and police attorneys to refute outmoded concepts about the importance of shell placement. Force Science findings on this subject have recently been given enhanced credibility with the publication of a peer-reviewed report on the Institute’s unique work in an academic journal, validating that the research methods employed were sound.

In a detailed article titled “Fired Cartridge Case Ejection Patterns from Semi-automatic Firearms,” authored by a research team led by Lewinski, the current issue of Investigative Sciences Journal showcases the emphatic results from one of FSI’s studies, involving more than 7,600 rounds cycled through the 8 pistol models most commonly carried by LEOs. [Click here for the full article.]

These tests, the report states, “highlighted significant inconsistencies of spent cartridge-case ejection, compared to what is commonly expected and accepted.

The Journal is edited by Dr. James Adcock of the University of South Carolina and Dr. Henry Lee of the University of New Haven, with an editorial board of scholars from other institutions of higher learning in the U.S. and the United Kingdom. FSI’s research, Adcock states in an editor’s preface, “will be extremely helpful to those tasked with reconstructing shooting incidents.”


The featured study was conducted in California at a range operated in “a small sheltered valley” by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Dept. Forty-five deputy volunteers participated. They ranged in age from 22 to 50 and had from 2 months’ to 28 years’ LE experience.

Collectively, they fired 7,670 Winchester or Federal rounds from 9mm, .40-cal., and .45-cal handgun models: S&W 5906, Glock 17, Glock 21, Glock 23, Sig Sauer 226, Sig Sauer 229, H&K USP, and Beretta 92FS. These pistols are all designed to eject empty cases to the right rear.

Each deputy fired multiple rounds with gun held in 11 different positions. These covered a broad range of postures and manipulations: 1- and 2-handed grips at eye and waist levels while standing still and while turning; an awkward, improper 2-handed hold that an officer might unintentionally achieve in rushing to get on target; inward, angled cants that sometimes occur when rotating and shooting; muzzle angled downward at a 22-degree angle and upward at 45 degrees; and so on.

All positions and movements studied have been “performed by police officers in dynamic, rapidly unfolding life-and-death shooting situations,” as discerned from investigations of OISs across 30 years, Lewinski says.

When shooting, each deputy stood by a stake in the center of a 30-ft. x 30-ft. test site, which was covered to a depth of 3 inches with carefully leveled, fine-grain river sand. “This reduced the bounce factor of the ejected cases to nearly zero,” Lewinski explains.

The 900-sq.-ft. area was gridded with colored string into 1-ft. square sections. To further pinpoint where ejected cases landed, researchers used transparent plastic templates with 1-in. grid marks that could be inserted into any square where cartridges fell.

The weather was “hot and still each testing day, so wind was not a significant factor in the test results,” Lewinski says. An earthen bluff served as a backstop for the shooting.


“The results of this study demonstrated how unpredictable spent cartridge casing ejection patterns are,” the Journal report declares. The researchers documented “significant variability and uncertainty” about where a spent case “would come to rest” when ejected, the report says, emphasizing “the imprecision of identifying shooter location based solely on the location of a spent cartridge casing.”

For tabulation purposes, the gridded test area was divided into 4 quadrants that pin-wheeled around the shooter’s stake: right front and rear, and left front and rear. Lumping all test positions and firearms together, 73.6 percent of the spent cases fell into the quadrant right and rear of the shooter’s position.

“This confirms what experts cite as the location that spent cartridge casings should land in when ejected from the firearms used in this study,” the researchers note.

However, they point out, this means that over 2,000 casings—a significant 26.4 percent of those fired during the study—landed outside the anticipated “correct” area. Indeed, consistent with previous Force Science studies, cases fell within the entire 360 degrees—all 4 quadrants—surrounding the shooting position. The final resting places of some cases were more than 20 feet apart. And even those that settled within the right-rear quadrant were scattered widely within that area’s 225-sq.-ft. dimensions.

“This illustrates how using the placement of a single spent cartridge casing to determine shooter location is not as precise as it may seem,” the researchers write. At best, casing location can “lead to only a tentative estimate of the shooter’s location.”

The posture that most often produced the traditionally expected right-rear result was the idealized training position: the “proper” 2-handed grip with arms extended and weapon uncanted and horizontal to the ground at eye level. When shots were fired from that position with the shooter stationary, ejected cases ended up in the right-rear quadrant 97 percent of the time. Even then, however, at least some rounds still landed in each of the other quadrants around the shooter.

Other positions produced more marked variances from the “norm.” For example, when a pistol was held down at a 22-degree angle and cantilevered in, as might easily occur during dynamic movement in a gunfight, less than 30 percent of expended casings landed to the right and rear of the shooter. The heaviest concentration (nearly 44 percent) ended up in the left-rear quadrant in that posture. Some 18 percent landed in the right-front.

“Changing the firearm position drastically changed the spent cartridge-casing pattern,” Lewinski says.


Data from the study were exhaustively analyzed, determining ejection results according to ammunition and make and model of weapon, as well as by stance and movement. Full details were too exhaustive to be included in the Journal report, but Lewinski states that “the only consistency is the inconsistency of where spent shells landed, whatever variable was under scrutiny.

“Unlike the relatively calm and precise gun-handling of range shooting, which results often in patterns as they are expected to occur, a real-life gunfight is almost certain to be complex, rapidly unfolding, time-pressured, and life-threatening, with very different grips, stances, movements, and angles of weapon deployment brought into play,” Lewinski says.

“Each person holds and fires a gun in his or her own idiosyncratic fashion under those conditions. The variables of human dynamics are usually unknown after the fact. Yet they impact profoundly on cartridge-case placement.

“In shooting investigations, it is imperative to obtain the most accurate shooter location that can be determined from the evidence. A shooter’s location can be vital in understanding how an encounter evolved. But investigators and others attempting to reconstruct a shooting event must understand that relying solely on where a spent shell is found to determine a shooter’s firing position can be a severely flawed method.

“Hopefully the publication of this study in a peer-reviewed journal will help in burying that dangerous mythology for good.”

Besides Lewinski, the research team authoring the new report includes Force Science Advisor Dr. William Hudson; David Karwoski, formerly on the law enforcement faculty at Minnesota State University-Mankato now serving as a leadership advisor to the Iraq government; and Force Science Research Assistant Christa Redmann.

Leave a Reply


  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Effective date: January 06, 2019

Force Science Institute, Ltd. (“us”, “we”, or “our”) operates the https://www.forcescience.org/ website (hereinafter referred to as the “Service”).

This page informs you of our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of personal data when you use our Service and the choices you have associated with that data. Our Privacy Policy for Force Science Institute, Ltd. is based on the Privacy Policy Template from Privacy Policies.

We use your data to provide and improve the Service. By using the Service, you agree to the collection and use of information in accordance with this policy. Unless otherwise defined in this Privacy Policy, the terms used in this Privacy Policy have the same meanings as in our Terms and Conditions, accessible from https://www.forcescience.org/

Information Collection And Use

We collect several different types of information for various purposes to provide and improve our Service to you.

Types of Data Collected

Personal Data

While using our Service, we may ask you to provide us with certain personally identifiable information that can be used to contact or identify you (“Personal Data”). Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to:

  • Email address
  • First name and last name
  • Phone number
  • Address, State, Province, ZIP/Postal code, City
  • Cookies and Usage Data

Usage Data

We may also collect information on how the Service is accessed and used (“Usage Data”). This Usage Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol address (e.g. IP address), browser type, browser version, the pages of our Service that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages, unique device identifiers and other diagnostic data.

Tracking & Cookies Data

We use cookies and similar tracking technologies to track the activity on our Service and hold certain information.

Cookies are files with small amount of data which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a website and stored on your device. Tracking technologies also used are beacons, tags, and scripts to collect and track information and to improve and analyze our Service.

You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our Service. You can learn more how to manage cookies in the Browser Cookies Guide.

Examples of Cookies we use:

  • Session Cookies. We use Session Cookies to operate our Service.
  • Preference Cookies. We use Preference Cookies to remember your preferences and various settings.
  • Security Cookies. We use Security Cookies for security purposes.

Use of Data

Force Science Institute, Ltd. uses the collected data for various purposes:

  • To provide and maintain the Service
  • To notify you about changes to our Service
  • To allow you to participate in interactive features of our Service when you choose to do so
  • To provide customer care and support
  • To provide analysis or valuable information so that we can improve the Service
  • To monitor the usage of the Service
  • To detect, prevent and address technical issues

Transfer Of Data

Your information, including Personal Data, may be transferred to — and maintained on — computers located outside of your state, province, country or other governmental jurisdiction where the data protection laws may differ than those from your jurisdiction.

If you are located outside United States and choose to provide information to us, please note that we transfer the data, including Personal Data, to United States and process it there.

Your consent to this Privacy Policy followed by your submission of such information represents your agreement to that transfer.

Force Science Institute, Ltd. will take all steps reasonably necessary to ensure that your data is treated securely and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and no transfer of your Personal Data will take place to an organization or a country unless there are adequate controls in place including the security of your data and other personal information.

Disclosure Of Data

Legal Requirements

Force Science Institute, Ltd. may disclose your Personal Data in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to:

  • To comply with a legal obligation
  • To protect and defend the rights or property of Force Science Institute, Ltd.
  • To prevent or investigate possible wrongdoing in connection with the Service
  • To protect the personal safety of users of the Service or the public
  • To protect against legal liability

Security Of Data

The security of your data is important to us, but remember that no method of transmission over the Internet, or method of electronic storage is 100% secure. While we strive to use commercially acceptable means to protect your Personal Data, we cannot guarantee its absolute security.

Service Providers

We may employ third party companies and individuals to facilitate our Service (“Service Providers”), to provide the Service on our behalf, to perform Service-related services or to assist us in analyzing how our Service is used.

These third parties have access to your Personal Data only to perform these tasks on our behalf and are obligated not to disclose or use it for any other purpose.


We may use third-party Service Providers to monitor and analyze the use of our Service.

  • Google AnalyticsGoogle Analytics is a web analytics service offered by Google that tracks and reports website traffic. Google uses the data collected to track and monitor the use of our Service. This data is shared with other Google services. Google may use the collected data to contextualize and personalize the ads of its own advertising network.You can opt-out of having made your activity on the Service available to Google Analytics by installing the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on. The add-on prevents the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js, analytics.js, and dc.js) from sharing information with Google Analytics about visits activity.For more information on the privacy practices of Google, please visit the Google Privacy & Terms web page: https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en

Links To Other Sites

Our Service may contain links to other sites that are not operated by us. If you click on a third party link, you will be directed to that third party’s site. We strongly advise you to review the Privacy Policy of every site you visit.

We have no control over and assume no responsibility for the content, privacy policies or practices of any third party sites or services.

Children’s Privacy

Our Service does not address anyone under the age of 18 (“Children”).

We do not knowingly collect personally identifiable information from anyone under the age of 18. If you are a parent or guardian and you are aware that your Children has provided us with Personal Data, please contact us. If we become aware that we have collected Personal Data from children without verification of parental consent, we take steps to remove that information from our servers.

Changes To This Privacy Policy

We may update our Privacy Policy from time to time. We will notify you of any changes by posting the new Privacy Policy on this page.

We will let you know via email and/or a prominent notice on our Service, prior to the change becoming effective and update the “effective date” at the top of this Privacy Policy.

You are advised to review this Privacy Policy periodically for any changes. Changes to this Privacy Policy are effective when they are posted on this page.

Contact Us

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, please contact us:

  • By email: support@forcescience.org
  • By visiting this page on our website: https://www.forcescience.org/contact
  • By phone number: 866-683-1944
  • By mail: Force Science Institute, Ltd.