fbpx

New Study Links Fatigue, Police Racial Bias

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Police officers show significantly greater evidence of unconscious racial bias when they’re fatigued, according to a newly reported study by a researcher at Washington State U. in Spokane.

“When officers received less sleep preceding each test session, they were significantly more likely to associate Black Americans with weapons compared with when they had received more sleep. In other words, sleep restriction appeared to increase anti-Black bias,” writes Dr. Lois James, an assistant professor who conducted the study. James specializes in exploring the relationship between sleep and performance in LEOs, military personnel, combat medics, and other “elite” populations.

The finding, she says, has “important implications for police training” and for “the current climate of police-citizen unrest.”

IMAGE ASSOCIATION

Across an 18-month period, James subjected a pool of 80 volunteers from a medium-size municipal PD (about 290 sworn) to four separate sessions of image-association tests. For the week immediately before each session, the officers’ sleep was monitored by a wristwatch-like device that objectively measured their individual “quantity, timing, and quality” of sleep.

On test day, the officers—predominately white males from all shifts with an average of 15 years on the job—individually faced a computer screen while pictures of white and black faces randomly appeared. Among these pictures, images of inanimate objects also appeared. Some objects were innocuous (wallets and cell phones, for example), but others randomly interspersed were weapons—handguns, shotguns, rifles, knives.

Once the object appeared, the officer was to press a button indicating whether it was a weapon or something non-dangerous. During a typical session of about 10 minutes, James told Force Science News, an officer would see approximately 100 faces, equally divided between black and white, and approximately 200 object images, equally divided between weapons and innocuous objects.

The officers were scored as to response time and accuracy: how fast did they decide whether an object shown was a potential threat and how often were their conclusions correct.

FINDINGS

Analyzing the results, James found that a strong majority of the officers tended to more quickly associate what they believed were weapons with black faces and were more often wrong in assessing innocuous objects as weapons when black faces were involved. These are considered valid indications of moderate to strong unconscious or “implicit” racial bias, she says.

A “large body” of similar findings have been reported from other studies as well. Indeed, implicit biases exist outside their conscious awareness “in people across many walks of life,” James writes, by no means just in cops.

But her study emphasizes two other discoveries:

  1. The degree of measured bias, ranging from none to strong anti-black bias and including even some anti-white bias, fluctuated significantly within individual officers across the four test sessions.

    This suggests that “implicit bias is a variable state, not a stable trait,” James writes, and thus “may well be susceptible to change.”

  2. Sleep and bias were significantly linked.

According to the wrist monitors, officers slept an average of about 7 hours per 24-hour period in the week before each test session. The range was broad, though, from 2.5 hours to 14.5 hours—and meaningful. The officers “displayed more anti-Black bias when they had received less sleep” before the tests, James writes.

This is similar to findings from a study by other researchers who tested resident physicians working in a hospital ER. They found that “implicit racial bias against Black Americans increased from preshift to postshift when the emergency department was particularly busy,” James writes, suggesting that and “internal stressors” like fatigue can have a definite attitudinal impact.

IMPLICATIONS

“The findings that bias is variable and also that sleep restriction increased anti-Black bias have implications,” James writes. “Specifically, if implicit racial bias is susceptible to change, then training designed to reduce bias is not doomed to failure. Furthermore, if tired officers are more biased, then programs designed to improve officer sleep may have consequences beyond improving officer health.”

Anti-bias training for police is needed, James writes. But just what constitutes the most effective training remains uncertain, she says. She hopes to shed light on that question through a three-year study she’s launching in January with 400 officers from Cleveland (OH) PD.

One-quarter of the participants will be assigned to each of four groups: a control group that receives no anti-bias training; a group that receives classroom training in detecting and managing implicit bias; a group that is trained using a unique anti-bias simulator program James principally designed, which we described in Force Science News #328 (1/10/17); and a group trained with both classroom and simulator methods.

“The goal,” she says, “is to identify best practices for reducing bias, leading to improved police decision-making and enhanced citizen trust.”

NOTE: In an interview with FSN, James stressed that evidence of implicit bias in officers does not necessarily translate into biased behavior on the street. In practice, officers appear able to “override” innate feelings of bias with professional conduct. In a previous FSN,  in fact, we described her results in an earlier study that found “officers were less likely to erroneously shoot Black suspects and were slower to shoot when faced with Black compared with White suspects.”

FSI’s executive director Dr. Bill Lewinski, who was not involved in James’ research, agrees that her laboratory findings should not be seen as predictive or reflective of decisions made in real-life encounters.

“It’s true that fatigue can influence judgment, usually in a negative fashion,” he told FSN. “But an officer’s decision to use force is a complex phenomenon, shaped by many variables including ‘priming’ information received from dispatch, contextual cues, past experience, furtive suspect movements, and so on. More research is yet to be done before we have definitive answers about decision-making under stress.

“Still, this is an important study that broadens our insights about the impact that sleep deprivation and fatigue have on the law enforcement profession.”

James’ current study, “The Stability of Implicit Racial Bias in Police Officers,” appears in the journal Police Quarterly and includes detailed descriptions of other research and findings regarding this phenomenon. click here for a free abstract and a link for ordering the full study for a fee.

Dr. James can be reached at WSU’s Sleep & Performance Research Center at: lois_james@wsu.edu.

Leave a Reply

GDPR

  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Effective date: January 06, 2019

Force Science Institute, Ltd. (“us”, “we”, or “our”) operates the https://www.forcescience.org/ website (hereinafter referred to as the “Service”).

This page informs you of our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of personal data when you use our Service and the choices you have associated with that data. Our Privacy Policy for Force Science Institute, Ltd. is based on the Privacy Policy Template from Privacy Policies.

We use your data to provide and improve the Service. By using the Service, you agree to the collection and use of information in accordance with this policy. Unless otherwise defined in this Privacy Policy, the terms used in this Privacy Policy have the same meanings as in our Terms and Conditions, accessible from https://www.forcescience.org/

Information Collection And Use

We collect several different types of information for various purposes to provide and improve our Service to you.

Types of Data Collected

Personal Data

While using our Service, we may ask you to provide us with certain personally identifiable information that can be used to contact or identify you (“Personal Data”). Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to:

  • Email address
  • First name and last name
  • Phone number
  • Address, State, Province, ZIP/Postal code, City
  • Cookies and Usage Data

Usage Data

We may also collect information on how the Service is accessed and used (“Usage Data”). This Usage Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol address (e.g. IP address), browser type, browser version, the pages of our Service that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages, unique device identifiers and other diagnostic data.

Tracking & Cookies Data

We use cookies and similar tracking technologies to track the activity on our Service and hold certain information.

Cookies are files with small amount of data which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a website and stored on your device. Tracking technologies also used are beacons, tags, and scripts to collect and track information and to improve and analyze our Service.

You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our Service. You can learn more how to manage cookies in the Browser Cookies Guide.

Examples of Cookies we use:

  • Session Cookies. We use Session Cookies to operate our Service.
  • Preference Cookies. We use Preference Cookies to remember your preferences and various settings.
  • Security Cookies. We use Security Cookies for security purposes.

Use of Data

Force Science Institute, Ltd. uses the collected data for various purposes:

  • To provide and maintain the Service
  • To notify you about changes to our Service
  • To allow you to participate in interactive features of our Service when you choose to do so
  • To provide customer care and support
  • To provide analysis or valuable information so that we can improve the Service
  • To monitor the usage of the Service
  • To detect, prevent and address technical issues

Transfer Of Data

Your information, including Personal Data, may be transferred to — and maintained on — computers located outside of your state, province, country or other governmental jurisdiction where the data protection laws may differ than those from your jurisdiction.

If you are located outside United States and choose to provide information to us, please note that we transfer the data, including Personal Data, to United States and process it there.

Your consent to this Privacy Policy followed by your submission of such information represents your agreement to that transfer.

Force Science Institute, Ltd. will take all steps reasonably necessary to ensure that your data is treated securely and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and no transfer of your Personal Data will take place to an organization or a country unless there are adequate controls in place including the security of your data and other personal information.

Disclosure Of Data

Legal Requirements

Force Science Institute, Ltd. may disclose your Personal Data in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to:

  • To comply with a legal obligation
  • To protect and defend the rights or property of Force Science Institute, Ltd.
  • To prevent or investigate possible wrongdoing in connection with the Service
  • To protect the personal safety of users of the Service or the public
  • To protect against legal liability

Security Of Data

The security of your data is important to us, but remember that no method of transmission over the Internet, or method of electronic storage is 100% secure. While we strive to use commercially acceptable means to protect your Personal Data, we cannot guarantee its absolute security.

Service Providers

We may employ third party companies and individuals to facilitate our Service (“Service Providers”), to provide the Service on our behalf, to perform Service-related services or to assist us in analyzing how our Service is used.

These third parties have access to your Personal Data only to perform these tasks on our behalf and are obligated not to disclose or use it for any other purpose.

Analytics

We may use third-party Service Providers to monitor and analyze the use of our Service.

  • Google AnalyticsGoogle Analytics is a web analytics service offered by Google that tracks and reports website traffic. Google uses the data collected to track and monitor the use of our Service. This data is shared with other Google services. Google may use the collected data to contextualize and personalize the ads of its own advertising network.You can opt-out of having made your activity on the Service available to Google Analytics by installing the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on. The add-on prevents the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js, analytics.js, and dc.js) from sharing information with Google Analytics about visits activity.For more information on the privacy practices of Google, please visit the Google Privacy & Terms web page: https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en

Links To Other Sites

Our Service may contain links to other sites that are not operated by us. If you click on a third party link, you will be directed to that third party’s site. We strongly advise you to review the Privacy Policy of every site you visit.

We have no control over and assume no responsibility for the content, privacy policies or practices of any third party sites or services.

Children’s Privacy

Our Service does not address anyone under the age of 18 (“Children”).

We do not knowingly collect personally identifiable information from anyone under the age of 18. If you are a parent or guardian and you are aware that your Children has provided us with Personal Data, please contact us. If we become aware that we have collected Personal Data from children without verification of parental consent, we take steps to remove that information from our servers.

Changes To This Privacy Policy

We may update our Privacy Policy from time to time. We will notify you of any changes by posting the new Privacy Policy on this page.

We will let you know via email and/or a prominent notice on our Service, prior to the change becoming effective and update the “effective date” at the top of this Privacy Policy.

You are advised to review this Privacy Policy periodically for any changes. Changes to this Privacy Policy are effective when they are posted on this page.

Contact Us

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, please contact us:

  • By email: support@forcescience.org
  • By visiting this page on our website: https://www.forcescience.org/contact
  • By phone number: 866-683-1944
  • By mail: Force Science Institute, Ltd.