Recent Developments In Post-OIS Procedures: Tale Of 3 Cities

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

1. Chicago officers win right to 24-hr. “grace period”

An arbitrator has ruled that Chicago officers involved in shootings can wait at least 24 hours before having to give a recorded statement to investigators from the municipal agency that reviews police shootings.

The decision resulted from a grievance filed by Chicago Lodge 7 of the Fraternal Order of Police against the city’s Independent Police Review Authority. That civilian agency investigates all Chicago PD shootings, as well as complaints of officer misconduct, and makes recommendations for “appropriate disciplinary action” to the police superintendent if violations of departmental rules and regulations are found.

Late last year the IPRA asserted that under the city’s contract with the FOP it had the right to compel an involved officer to give an official recorded interview within 2 hours of a shooting, regardless of the officer’s level of stress or sleep deprivation. FOP president Mike Shields characterized this as a “uniquely incorrect position” and pushed the matter to arbitration.

Recently arbitrator Peter Feuille ruled that unless an officer wants to talk sooner the IPRA must wait at least 24 hours after a shooting before its investigators can conduct a detailed interview and that the questioning can occur only between 0600 and 1800. If a shooting occurred at 7 pm, for example, at least 35 hours would then elapse before the interview is required .

FOP attorney Paul Geiger told Force Science News: “This gives the officer a chance to rest through 1 sleep cycle, collect himself, and consult with an attorney during reasonable hours in order to give an accurate account of what happened.

“We are not against an officer talking to the IPRA under Garrity protection. We just want him to be able to give an informed, thoughtful statement. Given how hectic and emotional a shooting situation is, we think the rest period is important.”

Chicago is on track to nearly double the number of OISs in 2011 if the current rate continues. As of July 21 police have shot 40 suspects this year, nearly as many as in all of 2010. This is a mid-year high compared to the last 4 years. Aggravated assaults and batteries of officers by the end of June had already exceeded the year’s total for 2000.

One OIS survivor, Ofcr. Danny O’Toole, who experienced 2 shootings in 2 weeks, told the Chicago Sun-Times: “The younger generation is brazen. They just don’t care.” FOP spokesman Pat Camden agreed. “There’s no fear of the police,” he said.

The newspaper noted: “No Chicago police officers have been charged with criminal wrongdoing involving shootings in recent memory.”

2. OIS hearings in Jacksonville will no longer be public

In Jacksonville, FL, OIS hearing procedures will be changing somewhat because of a recent state Supreme Court ruling.

Police shootings are not uncommon for the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office, which provides protective services for the city and its surrounding county with a sworn force of some 1,700 officers. Across the last decade, OISs there have ranged from 6 to 28 annually.

Investigations are conducted by detectives from the agency’s homicide unit. Evidence, including in-person Q & A with involved officers, is heard and assessed for administrative purposes by a 5-person departmental Response to Resistance Board (Jacksonville’s term for a use-of-force review body).

Reflecting Sheriff John Rutherford’s devotion to transparency and community trust-building, the RTRB hearings have been open affairs. Interested members of the public, the media, and even relatives and supporters of suspects have been welcome to attend.

Undersheriff Dwain Senterfitt, who formerly chaired Board hearings when he was director of investigations, explains that in questioning the involved officer, “the Board gets into the nitty-gritty: what was he thinking, what was he doing, and why. The lead investigator presents witness statements, the medical examiner’s findings, and other evidence. The involved officer can sit through the entire hearing, with his attorney present.

“In the end, the Board’s recommendation is for no further action, more training, or referral to IA. Ultimately, the sheriff decides what action is then taken.”

Senterfitt feels that having the hearings open has been “absolutely satisfactory” in assuring civilians that “we look at officers’ actions and hold them accountable.” But the officers’ bargaining agent, FOP Lodge 5-30, took issue with the custom.

In a lawsuit, the FOP argued that the RTRB hearings were, in fact, internal investigations and as such should be confidential under Florida law until concluded. The case worked its way to a panel of the state Supreme Court, which agreed. The Sheriff’s Office asked for a review by the full court, which was declined last month (June).

Thus, “future Board hearings will still be held but will be closed to the media and the public at the time they occur,” Senterfitt told Force Science News. After the case is fully concluded, the SO will make a video disk of the Board hearing available to the media and interested public parties.

Except for limited sensitive information—an officer’s home address, for example—the disk will contain the full, unedited Board proceeding. This conforms to Florida’s open records law, Senterfitt says.

Meanwhile, Jacksonville’s other post-shooting practices will remain in place as they have been, Senterfitt says. For example:

  • At the scene, the involved officer is expected to supply only “a few basic generalities” to the lead investigator, such as: Are there suspects at large? What evidence needs to be gathered and where should it be sought? What’s the scope of the scene? What witnesses should be questioned? The officer meets promptly with an FOP attorney, who decides what additional information, if any, is shared with investigators initially. “The attorney does the talking,” Senterfitt says.
  • A “buddy officer” is assigned to provide companionship and help tend to personal needs of the involved officer. Personnel trained in critical incident stress management confer with the officer on what potentially to expect physiologically and emotionally in the next 24-48 hours, and an assistant chief briefs the officer on what lies ahead administratively.
  • Jacksonville patrol officers work a rotation cycle of 5 days on, 5 days off. After a shooting, the involved officer goes on administrative leave for his next time-off period, plus whatever time is left of his current work period. Besides a mandatory visit with a psychologist during this time, he meets with the FOP attorney and prepares a brief (usually about 1 page, Senterfitt says) written statement about the shooting, which goes to the SO and the state’s attorney’s office.
  • Once the prosecutor decides whether the shooting was legally justified (usually 2-3 months after the event, Senterfitt says), the department then schedules the RTRB hearing. Chaired by the agency’s investigations director, the Board includes the director of the training academy, 2 assistant chiefs, and a lieutenant.

“We’ve had this procedure in place for several years now,” Senterfitt says, “and we like what we do. We like to conduct the process so that anyone who looks at it can see that we did things right. But we’re not above changing it or stealing good ideas from someone else to improve it.”

“Jacksonville has made a commendable effort to maintain continued transparency for the community and still protect the rights and well-being of officers after major force events,” says Dr. Bill Lewinski, executive director of the Force Science Institute. “Whenever significant force is used, a delicate balance is required between officer support, accountability, and openness. If any element ultimately is lost, the integrity of the system is damaged.”

[For more information on Jacksonville’s post-OIS practices, the undersheriff can be reached at: dwain.senterfitt@jaxsheriff.org.]

3. New day in Santa Fe for OIS survivors

It’s been a long climb to enlightenment for the Santa Fe (NM) PD since the dark night 5 years ago when officers were left, literally, out in the cold after a shooting.

In FSN Transmission #94 [Click here to read it] we detailed the sorry fate of Ofcr. Shannon Brady, who in 2006 shot and killed a coked-up domestic batterer when he lunged at her and her sergeant with a folding knife.

The officers were kept at the scene for 5 hours, with Brady much of that time sitting “alone on an ice-cold curb” and with even her request for a jacket having to be cleared through the chain of command. Her gun surrendered, she was left with an empty holster in a neighborhood known to be dangerous. When she and the sergeant needed a bathroom break, they were transported, like suspects, in the cage of a marked unit. Except for a catnap, Brady had been awake for more than 46 hours when she faced 2 hours of interrogation for her formal statement. Roughly a year passed then before she was officially exonerated.

“The easiest part was the shooting itself,” she says. “The worst was what happened afterward. This department had lost sight of what human beings need. I made a vow to myself that I would do everything in my power to see that no other officer ever had to go through an ordeal like that in the future.”

Through several changes of command staff, she and allies she’s won along the way have doggedly kept to that promise, researching potential new procedures, drafting proposals, meeting with and lobbying shot-callers, and so on. Over time, they’ve prompted a myriad of new departmental practices that provide immediate and long-term support for critical-incident survivors and help prepare other officers for crises yet to come.

After shootings, involved officers are now “removed from the scene as soon as realistically possible,” says Brady, who became a detective last winter. They’re transported to a comfortable site for administrative processing, allowed to call family immediately, and can have an officer of their choice at their side for companionship and emotional support. “Formal interviewing is delayed at least 48 hours to permit the officers to get some rest,” Brady says, and officers have access to a psychologist for dealing with post-shooting issues. Internal Affairs is said to be “working on expediting” its investigative process.

The core achievement in Santa Fe’s reform package, however, extends beyond shooting encounters. It’s the establishment of a broad-ranged Peer Support Team, designed to help any officer weather and thrive after “any personal or professional crisis” that adversely affects the officer or his/her family or “any event during which the sights, smells, or sounds are so vivid as to cause an immediate or delayed increase of stress or stress reactions.”

Such incidents may include not only shootings and other deadly force attacks, but also serious injuries to an officer or loved one, “an accumulation of stressful calls in a short period of time,” “unusual or gruesome injury or death of a child,” divorce or child-custody disputes, lawsuits and IA investigations, the death of another officer, thoughts of self-destruction, and “any incident outside our normal range of experience,” Brady says.

Family members as well as officers are eligible for the Team’s services, which are also available to other law enforcement agencies and fire departments that request help.

Headed by Brady, the Team consists of 12 volunteers with 2 to 22 years on the job and ranks from police officer to captain. All have been trained by the International Critical Incident Stress Foundation and can handle 1-on-1 consultations as well as after-action group “defusings and emotional debriefings.”

An on-scene supervisor is expected to notify the Team leader whenever a shooting, line-of-duty death, serious-injury event, or other potentially traumatic happenstance occurs, and the leader then promptly initiates the support actions deemed appropriate. For crisis situations beyond the Team volunteers’ expertise (alcohol and substance abuse treatment, for example), they can research and refer officers to outside resources.

After the Team coalesced last year after months of planning, it got its baptism by fire when 2 teenagers were killed in a major DUI pileup. “It was an ugly mess, and several rookies were on the scene,” Brady recalls. “We did a group debrief afterward and that went very smoothly. A deputy chief commented that in over 20 years of police work, he’d never attended a debrief for a fatal crash and didn’t realize how necessary it was.”

Brady, whose husband Sgt. Mark Kmatz is a certified Force Science Analyst with the Bernalillo County (NM) SD, plans to keep expanding the Team’s reach. She envisions creating a “comprehensive wellness program” for PD and FD personnel, retirement coaching and financial planning projects, more extensive stress resilience training for recruits, guidance for supervisors on how to identify officers in need of help, annual sessions on emotional survival conducted by Force Science board member Dr. Kevin Gilmartin, and much more.

Having reviewed the practices of dozens of other agencies, she says she’s “shocked” to find how little attention most departments are paying to such issues. Too often, she laments, “the law enforcement culture tends to dismiss what ongoing exposure to stress and trauma can do to its people. So few agencies seem to be thinking ahead.”

What’s been accomplished in Santa Fe “has been a huge, huge thing for me personally,” she says. “It has provided a sense of closure on my incident.” In the time since her shooting she has also completed most of the requirements for a master’s degree in psychology, which she believes will help her achieve the goals that lie ahead.

“Helping other cops is my baby, my pet professional project,” she says. “Let’s face it—I’m still a squeaky wheel.”

Says Dr. Lewinski: “The Santa Fe experience is a striking example of how determined and persistent officers can take misfortune and transform it into profound changes that make a difference not only to themselves but to an entire department. Congratulations on hard work well done!”

[Brady welcomes inquiries from officers interested in establishing Peer Support Teams in their own agencies. She says she can share her research on the subject and help strategize an action plan. She can be reached at: slbradykmatz@santafenm.gov.]

GDPR

  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Effective date: January 06, 2019

Force Science Institute, Ltd. (“us”, “we”, or “our”) operates the https://www.forcescience.org/ website (hereinafter referred to as the “Service”).

This page informs you of our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of personal data when you use our Service and the choices you have associated with that data. Our Privacy Policy for Force Science Institute, Ltd. is based on the Privacy Policy Template from Privacy Policies.

We use your data to provide and improve the Service. By using the Service, you agree to the collection and use of information in accordance with this policy. Unless otherwise defined in this Privacy Policy, the terms used in this Privacy Policy have the same meanings as in our Terms and Conditions, accessible from https://www.forcescience.org/

Information Collection And Use

We collect several different types of information for various purposes to provide and improve our Service to you.

Types of Data Collected

Personal Data

While using our Service, we may ask you to provide us with certain personally identifiable information that can be used to contact or identify you (“Personal Data”). Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to:

  • Email address
  • First name and last name
  • Phone number
  • Address, State, Province, ZIP/Postal code, City
  • Cookies and Usage Data

Usage Data

We may also collect information on how the Service is accessed and used (“Usage Data”). This Usage Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol address (e.g. IP address), browser type, browser version, the pages of our Service that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages, unique device identifiers and other diagnostic data.

Tracking & Cookies Data

We use cookies and similar tracking technologies to track the activity on our Service and hold certain information.

Cookies are files with small amount of data which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a website and stored on your device. Tracking technologies also used are beacons, tags, and scripts to collect and track information and to improve and analyze our Service.

You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our Service. You can learn more how to manage cookies in the Browser Cookies Guide.

Examples of Cookies we use:

  • Session Cookies. We use Session Cookies to operate our Service.
  • Preference Cookies. We use Preference Cookies to remember your preferences and various settings.
  • Security Cookies. We use Security Cookies for security purposes.

Use of Data

Force Science Institute, Ltd. uses the collected data for various purposes:

  • To provide and maintain the Service
  • To notify you about changes to our Service
  • To allow you to participate in interactive features of our Service when you choose to do so
  • To provide customer care and support
  • To provide analysis or valuable information so that we can improve the Service
  • To monitor the usage of the Service
  • To detect, prevent and address technical issues

Transfer Of Data

Your information, including Personal Data, may be transferred to — and maintained on — computers located outside of your state, province, country or other governmental jurisdiction where the data protection laws may differ than those from your jurisdiction.

If you are located outside United States and choose to provide information to us, please note that we transfer the data, including Personal Data, to United States and process it there.

Your consent to this Privacy Policy followed by your submission of such information represents your agreement to that transfer.

Force Science Institute, Ltd. will take all steps reasonably necessary to ensure that your data is treated securely and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and no transfer of your Personal Data will take place to an organization or a country unless there are adequate controls in place including the security of your data and other personal information.

Disclosure Of Data

Legal Requirements

Force Science Institute, Ltd. may disclose your Personal Data in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to:

  • To comply with a legal obligation
  • To protect and defend the rights or property of Force Science Institute, Ltd.
  • To prevent or investigate possible wrongdoing in connection with the Service
  • To protect the personal safety of users of the Service or the public
  • To protect against legal liability

Security Of Data

The security of your data is important to us, but remember that no method of transmission over the Internet, or method of electronic storage is 100% secure. While we strive to use commercially acceptable means to protect your Personal Data, we cannot guarantee its absolute security.

Service Providers

We may employ third party companies and individuals to facilitate our Service (“Service Providers”), to provide the Service on our behalf, to perform Service-related services or to assist us in analyzing how our Service is used.

These third parties have access to your Personal Data only to perform these tasks on our behalf and are obligated not to disclose or use it for any other purpose.

Analytics

We may use third-party Service Providers to monitor and analyze the use of our Service.

  • Google AnalyticsGoogle Analytics is a web analytics service offered by Google that tracks and reports website traffic. Google uses the data collected to track and monitor the use of our Service. This data is shared with other Google services. Google may use the collected data to contextualize and personalize the ads of its own advertising network.You can opt-out of having made your activity on the Service available to Google Analytics by installing the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on. The add-on prevents the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js, analytics.js, and dc.js) from sharing information with Google Analytics about visits activity.For more information on the privacy practices of Google, please visit the Google Privacy & Terms web page: https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en

Links To Other Sites

Our Service may contain links to other sites that are not operated by us. If you click on a third party link, you will be directed to that third party’s site. We strongly advise you to review the Privacy Policy of every site you visit.

We have no control over and assume no responsibility for the content, privacy policies or practices of any third party sites or services.

Children’s Privacy

Our Service does not address anyone under the age of 18 (“Children”).

We do not knowingly collect personally identifiable information from anyone under the age of 18. If you are a parent or guardian and you are aware that your Children has provided us with Personal Data, please contact us. If we become aware that we have collected Personal Data from children without verification of parental consent, we take steps to remove that information from our servers.

Changes To This Privacy Policy

We may update our Privacy Policy from time to time. We will notify you of any changes by posting the new Privacy Policy on this page.

We will let you know via email and/or a prominent notice on our Service, prior to the change becoming effective and update the “effective date” at the top of this Privacy Policy.

You are advised to review this Privacy Policy periodically for any changes. Changes to this Privacy Policy are effective when they are posted on this page.

Contact Us

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, please contact us:

  • By email: [email protected]
  • By visiting this page on our website: https://www.forcescience.org/contact
  • By phone number: 866-683-1944
  • By mail: Force Science Institute, Ltd.