Surprises, Frustrations, Lucky Breaks: Lessons From NJ Mall Shooting

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a 20-year-old white male, dressed in black and wearing a black motorcycle helmet, stepped through the door with his finger on the trigger of an assault rifle, it turned out to be a lucky night for police and patrons at New Jersey’s largest shopping mall.

Starting at about 1730 hours Nov. 4, the gunman randomly fired multiple rounds as he roamed through the Westfield Garden State Plaza in Paramus, shooting at security cameras, advertising signs, and haphazardly into the air, spreading panic with every step. But his only human target was himself. Eventually in a secluded part of the 2.1-million-square-foot complex, he squeezed off a killing shot to his head.

An estimated 250 LEOs from 20 different agencies swarmed to the scene to hunt him down after the first 911 call. For them it became a rare exercise: an extended, full-scale, real-world active-shooter call-out, with a zero casualty count among the innocent. In effect, a unique on-the-job training operation.

Among the responders was a Force Science News subscriber, a veteran cop and firearms trainer we’ll call Dave K. Recently, on condition of anonymity, he shared his candid observations on the experience from the perspective of a boots-on-the-ground officer.

Here are highlights of his surprises, frustrations, and lessons learned while helping to handle the first active-shooter event of his 17-year career.


“Malls suck to clear,” says Dave K. In the Plaza, nearly 350 stores and a cineplex are arrayed along two enclosed tiers. When he arrived, the gunman was still at large in this vast maze, precise location unknown.

Along with a cluster of officers from his department who formed up together, Dave was told by a chief from another agency “who seemed to be directing people” to check out a remote section in the cavernous complex that had not yet been secured or evacuated.

Although their objective was perhaps half a mile away, Dave estimates, “and everyone was cranked up to get there, we consciously held back from an all-out sprint, both for tactical reasons and to avoid being physically spent when we got there.”

Once inside, he says he and the others were “bombarded with a stimulus overload.”

“Everything in a mall is designed to grab your attention,” he explains. “Mannequins are everywhere. You catch them in your peripheral vision or straight ahead when you’re scanning, and in your heightened state of alertness, they look like real people just standing there motionless.

“You’re trying to take in and evaluate information quickly, and the mannequins start playing with your mind. It was very frustrating the inordinate amount of time I had to spend looking at something to define it.”

The profusion of mirrors added to the distraction and confusion. Moving through one store, he says, “I was startled by my own reflection and almost shot it.” Also “wreaking havoc on perceptions” at times was glare reflecting off of large glass surfaces from strong commercial lighting and through skylights from helicopters sweeping the mall’s roof.


At one point, with the suspect still at large, all officers from Dave K.’s agency who were on-scene were ordered to abandon what they were doing and report to the CP. “Someone had decided we needed to sign in for purposes of accountability,” he says. “That might have been well and good at some point, but it was contrary to our training and badly timed. We were pissed.”

Once registered, officers waited around the CP for redeployment. “If you don’t give people a job that occupies their mind, it’s amazing how fast the level of alertness starts to drop,” Dave says. “Pretty soon officers had their hands in their pockets, smokin’ and jokin’. The complacency was unbelievable, with civilians still inside the mall, the shooter still not found,” and a shadowy parking lot just steps away “jammed with vehicles and onlookers who hadn’t at all been screened!”


Dave K. notes that the CP was set up in a lobby area of the mall–just inside the doorway the gunman used when he entered. “In my opinion, that was in the hot zone, and it was packed with brass,” Dave says. “The shooter could easily have come back there. Yet except for a mall security guard, there was no perimeter protection.”

On an impromptu basis, Dave “grabbed” a cadre of officers to fill that function. “Don’t stand around waiting for something to happen,” he advises. “Support the mission as best you can, but never hesitate to exercise individual initiative when necessary.”

He also expressed concern to some of the command personnel about the possibility of IEDs having been planted in the area as secondary assault weapons. “I’d had some counter-terrorism training that emphasized that kind of threat,” he says. But his concern was “just dismissed” without consideration.

He says, ruefully: “Don’t expect your superiors to know what kind of training they sent you to so you could deal with situations like that. They may not know how to implement it anyway, because they won’t know what it entailed and won’t have the time or presence of mind to absorb and apply it at the moment of crisis.”

Dave estimates it took “about an hour” before command personnel formulated and implemented a formal strategy for canvassing the mall. “Each agency present was assigned a specific area to evacuate,” he says. “Many stores were in lock-down. It was a long and tedious process,” and the perceptual distortions mentioned earlier constituted a continuing impediment.

In Dave’s area, officers found shattered glass, spent rifle shells, and a bullet hole in an advertising display–evidence that the shooter had passed that way. As they worked, a distant gunshot rang out. Ironically, it proved to be a negligent discharge of an officer’s shotgun–the only round fired by law enforcement during the call-out.


It’s been said that an active-shooter call is a “come-as-you-are war”; whatever equipment you have with you when you exit your patrol car is all you’re likely to have throughout the siege, no matter what challenges you encounter.

Dave K. ran to the mall that night with a well-prepped go-bag on his shoulder and an AR-15 in hand. Most officers he saw had only pistols or shotguns. The AR is his personal weapon that he has kept with him on patrol (unauthorized) for more than a decade because his agency has equipped only a limited number of units officially with urban rifles. “The suspect was believed to be walking around with an AK-47,” he says. “I wasn’t about to go up against him without my AR.”

Among the items he keeps stocked in his go-bag are: a backup pistol, extra magazines for his handguns and rifle, a knife, a tourniquet, QuikClot, Israeli battle dressings, glow sticks, two flashlights, extra batteries, and gloves. The backup gun is in a pouch on the side of the bag, the QuikClot attached to the strap, where they’re easy to reach.

“If there’s something I might need, I bring it with me,” he says. “There are two things I should have added that night: water and something to eat.”


“Our portable radios didn’t work well inside the mall,” Dave says. “There was a lot of static and often the signal was so weak we couldn’t get through to dispatch. Nor could we receive much information as the night progressed.” In the confusion of an evolving situation, some dispatches were inaccurate. Early on, for example, the suspect was described as a black male, Dave says, leading to at least one civilian sitting in his car in the parking lot to be harshly challenged at gunpoint.

“Cell phones worked better than radios, but there are a lot of buttons to push and you have to be accurate to make the call,” he says. “The first thing to go when you’re under stress is your fine motor skills, so making calls can be a lot tougher than you’re used to.”


Throughout the night, Dave and other responders searched the far reaches of the mall, hunting for the suspect, releasing frightened customers and employees from locked-down stores, and shepherding them to safety. “Adrenalin overcame fatigue at the time,” he says.

It was before dawn when Dave was on the mall’s second level that he heard voices calling for a bomb tech from somewhere below him. The offender had finally been found deep in an area under construction, dead. A cell phone was discovered near his hand, and it was initially thought he might have tried to remotely detonate an IED, Dave says. In reality, he had texted a final message: “Sorry.”

It appears he may never have intended to kill anyone other than himself. He is believed to have had drug and mental problems and may have hoped that by shooting up the mall he could provoke a suicide-by-cop confrontation.

Although Dave’s long hours at Garden State Plaza never proved to be life-threatening, he says he “really felt the impact” a day later. “My back hurt from carrying around extra gear, I was very exhausted, and I just couldn’t function well,” he says. “At home the next evening, my wife asked me some simple question–about moving furniture or something–and I couldn’t come up with an answer. I just couldn’t process it.”

On reflection he acknowledges, “We were lucky–very, very lucky this time. We weren’t dealing with a terrorist or someone else determined to commit mass murder. We had an opportunity to surface our weaknesses without costing innocent lives.

“I observed many people from many departments perform with great professional skill. There was no hesitation by officers about going into a dangerous place with many unknowns. I was proud to wear the patch of an agency that was part of it. Hopefully, what we learned will sharpen our skills for next time.”

Editor’s note: There are approximately 109,500 malls and shopping centers in the US. With their heavy concentration of largely unprepared civilians in a confined space, they are considered prime targets for attacks. Indeed, according to a report last week by the Reuters news agency, active-shooter incidents at such places have tripled in the last three years.

Are those in your jurisdiction a part of your well-rehearsed planning and training?

Our thanks to firearms expert John Farnam, president of Defense Training International, for helping to facilitate this story. For a detailed account of how one agency conducts exceptional active-shooter training exercises, see a previous Force Science News, accessible at: https://www.forcescience.org/2013/06/how-cops-ems-collaborate-on-innovative-active-shooter-response/

Leave a Reply


  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Effective date: January 06, 2019

Force Science Institute, Ltd. (“us”, “we”, or “our”) operates the https://www.forcescience.org/ website (hereinafter referred to as the “Service”).

This page informs you of our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of personal data when you use our Service and the choices you have associated with that data. Our Privacy Policy for Force Science Institute, Ltd. is based on the Privacy Policy Template from Privacy Policies.

We use your data to provide and improve the Service. By using the Service, you agree to the collection and use of information in accordance with this policy. Unless otherwise defined in this Privacy Policy, the terms used in this Privacy Policy have the same meanings as in our Terms and Conditions, accessible from https://www.forcescience.org/

Information Collection And Use

We collect several different types of information for various purposes to provide and improve our Service to you.

Types of Data Collected

Personal Data

While using our Service, we may ask you to provide us with certain personally identifiable information that can be used to contact or identify you (“Personal Data”). Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to:

  • Email address
  • First name and last name
  • Phone number
  • Address, State, Province, ZIP/Postal code, City
  • Cookies and Usage Data

Usage Data

We may also collect information on how the Service is accessed and used (“Usage Data”). This Usage Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol address (e.g. IP address), browser type, browser version, the pages of our Service that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages, unique device identifiers and other diagnostic data.

Tracking & Cookies Data

We use cookies and similar tracking technologies to track the activity on our Service and hold certain information.

Cookies are files with small amount of data which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a website and stored on your device. Tracking technologies also used are beacons, tags, and scripts to collect and track information and to improve and analyze our Service.

You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our Service. You can learn more how to manage cookies in the Browser Cookies Guide.

Examples of Cookies we use:

  • Session Cookies. We use Session Cookies to operate our Service.
  • Preference Cookies. We use Preference Cookies to remember your preferences and various settings.
  • Security Cookies. We use Security Cookies for security purposes.

Use of Data

Force Science Institute, Ltd. uses the collected data for various purposes:

  • To provide and maintain the Service
  • To notify you about changes to our Service
  • To allow you to participate in interactive features of our Service when you choose to do so
  • To provide customer care and support
  • To provide analysis or valuable information so that we can improve the Service
  • To monitor the usage of the Service
  • To detect, prevent and address technical issues

Transfer Of Data

Your information, including Personal Data, may be transferred to — and maintained on — computers located outside of your state, province, country or other governmental jurisdiction where the data protection laws may differ than those from your jurisdiction.

If you are located outside United States and choose to provide information to us, please note that we transfer the data, including Personal Data, to United States and process it there.

Your consent to this Privacy Policy followed by your submission of such information represents your agreement to that transfer.

Force Science Institute, Ltd. will take all steps reasonably necessary to ensure that your data is treated securely and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and no transfer of your Personal Data will take place to an organization or a country unless there are adequate controls in place including the security of your data and other personal information.

Disclosure Of Data

Legal Requirements

Force Science Institute, Ltd. may disclose your Personal Data in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to:

  • To comply with a legal obligation
  • To protect and defend the rights or property of Force Science Institute, Ltd.
  • To prevent or investigate possible wrongdoing in connection with the Service
  • To protect the personal safety of users of the Service or the public
  • To protect against legal liability

Security Of Data

The security of your data is important to us, but remember that no method of transmission over the Internet, or method of electronic storage is 100% secure. While we strive to use commercially acceptable means to protect your Personal Data, we cannot guarantee its absolute security.

Service Providers

We may employ third party companies and individuals to facilitate our Service (“Service Providers”), to provide the Service on our behalf, to perform Service-related services or to assist us in analyzing how our Service is used.

These third parties have access to your Personal Data only to perform these tasks on our behalf and are obligated not to disclose or use it for any other purpose.


We may use third-party Service Providers to monitor and analyze the use of our Service.

  • Google AnalyticsGoogle Analytics is a web analytics service offered by Google that tracks and reports website traffic. Google uses the data collected to track and monitor the use of our Service. This data is shared with other Google services. Google may use the collected data to contextualize and personalize the ads of its own advertising network.You can opt-out of having made your activity on the Service available to Google Analytics by installing the Google Analytics opt-out browser add-on. The add-on prevents the Google Analytics JavaScript (ga.js, analytics.js, and dc.js) from sharing information with Google Analytics about visits activity.For more information on the privacy practices of Google, please visit the Google Privacy & Terms web page: https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en

Links To Other Sites

Our Service may contain links to other sites that are not operated by us. If you click on a third party link, you will be directed to that third party’s site. We strongly advise you to review the Privacy Policy of every site you visit.

We have no control over and assume no responsibility for the content, privacy policies or practices of any third party sites or services.

Children’s Privacy

Our Service does not address anyone under the age of 18 (“Children”).

We do not knowingly collect personally identifiable information from anyone under the age of 18. If you are a parent or guardian and you are aware that your Children has provided us with Personal Data, please contact us. If we become aware that we have collected Personal Data from children without verification of parental consent, we take steps to remove that information from our servers.

Changes To This Privacy Policy

We may update our Privacy Policy from time to time. We will notify you of any changes by posting the new Privacy Policy on this page.

We will let you know via email and/or a prominent notice on our Service, prior to the change becoming effective and update the “effective date” at the top of this Privacy Policy.

You are advised to review this Privacy Policy periodically for any changes. Changes to this Privacy Policy are effective when they are posted on this page.

Contact Us

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, please contact us:

  • By email: support@forcescience.org
  • By visiting this page on our website: https://www.forcescience.org/contact
  • By phone number: 866-683-1944
  • By mail: Force Science Institute, Ltd.